This sounds plausible enough, right? Humans became human, as it were, with the emergence 1.8m years ago of a species called Homo erectus. This had a skeleton much like modern man’s—a big, brain-filled skull and a narrow pelvis and rib cage, which imply a small abdomen and thus a small gut. Hitherto, the explanation for this shift from the smaller skulls and wider pelvises of man’s apelike ancestors has been a shift from a vegetable-based diet to a meat-based one. Meat has more calories than plant matter, the theory went. A smaller gut could therefore support a larger brain. So far, so good? Well, via a commenter on Art’s private blog who called attention to this article in The Economist, maybe not. What’s Cooking? – The evolutionary role of cookery. And, so… Dr Wrangham disagrees. When you do the sums, he argues, raw meat is still insufficient to bridge the gap. He points out that even modern “raw foodists”, members of a town-dwelling, back-to-nature social movement, struggle to maintain their weight—and they have access to animals and plants that have been bred for the table. Pre-agricultural man confined to raw food would have starved. Start cooking, however, and things change…
The price for membership is $50.00 per Year.
One simple annual charge for everything. Saves $22 off the monthly price of $6. 30% savings. Easy Peasy.
The price for membership is $6.00 per Month.
Monthly subscription for everything, $6 per month. Cancel at any time with a click.