Neo-Xenophobia: How Masturbation, Homosexuality and Working Women Threaten the White Race

Xenophobia is a dislike or fear of people from other countries or of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange. Some definitions suggest xenophobia as arising from irrationality or unreason. It comes from the Greek words ξένος (xenos), meaning “stranger,” “foreigner,” and φόβος (phobos), meaning “fear.”

Xenophobia can manifest itself in many ways involving the relations and perceptions of an ingroup towards an outgroup, including a fear of losing identity, suspicion of its activities, aggression, and desire to eliminate its presence to secure a presumed purity. Xenophobia can also be exhibited in the form of an “uncritical exaltation of another culture” in which a culture is ascribed “an unreal, stereotyped and exotic quality”.

So I’ve dubbed what I’m about to show you “neo-xenophobia.” I suppose plain racism would work too, but the guy actually uses a black African tribe as an example for whites to follow. From where do these ideas come from? Echo chambers, I suspect, but I’ll close with that. In the meantime, comments.

I’m going to preface this with an image.

picard facepalm2

Let me take the opportunity to introduce you to a new Internet meme I’ve come up with: JLPF — Jean Luc Picard Facepalm. Use it far & wide, so everyone can save some time.

I got a comment:

Where masturbation and homosexuality do not exist…

Women in the workplace spells doom…

Plus a link to a relationship between porn viewing and bi-sexuality that I can’t locate at the moment.

In other words “a tribe” has an interest in treating it’s woman like the reproductive goddesses that they are.

Western man will be extinct, in the blink of an eye, all because women are free to ride that alpha-cock carousal, thus breeding out the beta-males that make an advanced industrial society possible.

Sexual anarchy devolves into third world matriarchy. Always has, always will. Of course I like third-world matriarchy…

And an excerpt from a follow-on comment of his.

In 1950 one-third of the worlds’ population was white. The white population is projected to be 10% by 2050 and lees than 3% by 2100.

From an evolutionary point of view this is interesting, no? Do white people who do care about this trend have a right to attempt to reverse this course?

I went back & forth with the commenter a little and frankly, I had never encountered this form of xenophobia before (masturbation, homosexuality, women in the workplace), so I honestly have no idea if it’s a one-off lunatic fringe or represents some neo-“thinking” on the part of some group with season tickets to an echo chamber. Whatever the case, ideas are ideas no matter how many people hold them and if one person can hold them—who’s at least competent enough to get an Internet account, get on, look up stuff and post comments—then certainly, many people can hold them. I like stuff out in the open. The worst thing that ever happened to the Neo Nazis was the Internet, where their ridiculous, laughable, ignorant screeds were out in the open instead of on badly mimeographed pamphlets.

So here’s an excellent reply from another commenter, ItsTheWooo. She tackles the masturbation and homosexuality aspects. I suppose that because she’s a working woman, a competent nurse who pays attention to medical issues kinda undercuts the “woman in the workplace” stuff by implication:

Abject bullshit.

Transgendered / sexually atypical people exist in hunter gatherer tribes. Additionally, gendered behavior and sexual difference is not cultural or social phenomenon, it is biologically real. Scientists can alter the instinctual mating behavior of animals by modulating endocrine environment prenatally… this is an approximation of human homosexuality. Homosexual people often show hallmarks of an endocrine milieu that is atypical for their sex, such as 2d:4d finger length ratio (this reflects prenatal testosterone), or the development of inner ear (different between males/females).

Whether or not the Nngandu have a name for homosexuality and view it as “seeking children” is irrelevant to the biological reality that sexual drive and desire and instinctual sexual behaviors is biologically immutable, the product of sex steroid milieu prior and/or shortly after birth.

Rather like thirst or appetite, one’s sexual preferences and instinctual gendered behavior is not impressed upon us by culture or society.

Masturbation is an entirely natural activity virtually all animals engage in some form or other (masturbation defined as non-reproductive sexual behavior which is not homosexuality).

I’m not a Nngandu tribe expert so I have no idea how full of shit or not is this article, but one thing I do know for a fact is their attitudes are not ubiquitous; you can also find other hunter gatherer people with rather different sexual attitudes, permissive of gendered difference and non-reproductive sexual expression.

In other words, homosexuality and masturbation are not evil jew leftist conspiracy to destroy the white race: sorry buddy. They occur naturally and are biologically real drives; in the scientific world (not the fake jesus based one you prefer) a great deal is known from animal research how various sex steroids affect brain development prenatally producing gender specific behavior and sexual drives. In human beings who have endocrinopathies affecting sex steroids, gender identification and sexual behavior can be atypical for karyotype/biological sex far greater than chance (21-hydroxylase CAH in an xx fetus, or 17-alpha hydroxylase in an xy fetus for example).

The 21-hydroxylase prevents the normal synthesis of cortisol; prenatal testosterone excess is the result (again, SORRY a.b.dada brocrinologists; cortisol, testosterone and progesterone are closely related adrenal hormones; progesterone and related hormones promote wild testosterone excess )

On the other hand, 17-alpha hydroxylase prevents adrenal synthesis of testosterone and mineralcorticoids, and also affects testosterone synthesis in testes. Very low testosterone and undervirualization occurs.

These hormones do not just affect the development of primary sex characteristics (genetalia) but the brain is ALSO a primary sex organ, but an invisible one. Surprise surprise male and female brains develop quite differently prenatally/early postnatal due to the very different concentrations of various sex steroids. It is reasonably possible for the external genetalia to be “normal” for sex, but the brain may have developed sexually atypically enough to create a kind of third sex, with preference for same sex or gendered behavior more like opposite sex or a range of outcomes.

In other words, jesus loses, science/reality wins yet again. But I suppose if you actually cared about natural world and scientific reality vs your emotional crazy appeals to a pure white race and the leftist jeeeeeeew! scourge turning us into masturbating homosexuals allowing our reproductive goddesses to work outside the home, you might know about these things.

So much blinded-me-with-science awesome there, I commented in excerpts that begin here.

I’ll add one edited excerpt from one of my own previous comments in the thread.

“Do white people who do care about this trend have a right to attempt to reverse this course?”

What do you mean by a “right?” Does that mean that whites have a “right” to curtail births of blacks, browns, yellows & reds? Does it mean they have a “right” to force breed more whites?

What does that mean, really, in concrete terms? State your terms. What do you advocate?

I have no problem—though I think it short-sighted and ignorant—with saying: hey, crackers, don’t masturbate—”spill your seed” in Biblical terms—drop them puppies into a vagina and let ‘em cook.

Otherwise, I see no voluntary solution to your perceived dilemma.

I’ve said it a bunch of times going back years: in the end, we’re all brown. That is, in a modern society with quick migration that doesn’t take generations as it used to, skin color is going to homogenize and I figure if you mix everything together, you get brown.

I don’t care about skin color. I do care about culture, but even that is a homogenizing trend over a couple of thousand years, now. Why do you think you like to go to Chinatown, or eat Italian, Japanese or Thai…in America, Land of the Free and Home of Whitey? What will be the dominant meta-culture in the end? I don’t know but as America has been the most attractive place to migrate to for a couple of centuries, I’m sure our own meta-culture (that absorbs and assimilates other cultures quite peacefully and easily) will have a major stake. OTOH, we’re not perfect, so I’m sure there are still good practices (automatic ideas) from other cultures we can still absorb.

Wonderful, in my view.

…Echo chambers exist all around us. Some are strong, some weak, some just innocent clubs. The Internet is a powerful force in keeping echo chambers well trimmed, so that the grass doesn’t get out of hand.

What the Internet does is to put a revolving door on the chambers. That makes the echo chamber a potentially valuable tool in the ever evolving self-education of the individual—billions of individuals. So, long live the echo chamber, but confront the ideas they produce.

Richard Nikoley

I'm Richard Nikoley. Free The Animal began in 2003 and as of 2021, contains 5,000 posts. I blog what I wish...from health, diet, and food to travel and lifestyle; to politics, social antagonism, expat-living location and time independent—while you sleep—income. I celebrate the audacity and hubris to live by your own exclusive authority and take your own chances. Read More


  1. Gabriella Kadar on February 9, 2013 at 12:23

    Richard, you are definitely having fun. We need some Cow input here to make it even more entertaining.

    Too bad Wooo had to go to work at 3 p.m. LOL!

    • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 13:22

      “Richard, you are definitely having fun.”

      Too much, as they say.

      • Steve W on February 12, 2013 at 19:17

        Sorry I didn’t see this sooner. Been busy. All those crosses won’t burn themselves!

        Try this quote from John Derbyshire on for size,

        “If a species is divided into separate populations, and those populations are left in reproductive isolation from each other for many generations, they will diverge. If you return after several hundred generations have passed, you will observe that the various traits that characterize individuals of the species are now distributed at different frequencies in the various populations. After a few ten thousands of generations, the divergence of the populations will be so great they can no longer cross-breed; and that is the origin of species. This is Biology 101.

        Our species separated into two parts 50, 60, or 70 thousand years ago, depending on which paleoanthropologist you ask.  One part remained in Africa, the ancestral homeland. The other crossed into Southwest Asia, then split, and re-split, and re-split, until there were human populations living in near-total reproductive isolation from each other in all parts of the world. This went on for hundreds of generations, causing the divergences we see today. Different physical types, as well as differences in behavior, intelligence, and personality, are exactly what one would expect to observe when scrutinizing these divergent populations.”

        Mr. Nikoley do you believe that the so-called “achievement gap” is the fault of your latent white racism? Your parents’ latent white racism? I wonder how much more money whites like yourself will need to transfer to people of color before the “achievement gap” is finally closed. Why don’t the grandchildren of the Cali. interned Japanese need affirmative action and social services like the Mexican mestizos do? Why don’t the great grandchildren of the Chinese slave laborers need affirmative action and social services like the Africans do? Is it really all blank slate, all Jared Diamond, all of the time?

      • Steve W on February 12, 2013 at 19:18

        Gregory Cochran’s wiki page on homosexuality,

        “A related hypothesis is that the proximal cause of homosexuality must be an infection. Cochran does not suggest that an infectious agent that causes homosexuality is spread by homosexuals. The premise is that homosexuality reduces the number of offspring and would lead to the genes carried by a homosexual person to be progressively eliminated over generations. Cochran maintains that the observed level of prevalence of exclusive homosexuality (3 to 4 percent of men and 1 to 2 percent of women in the United States) means genes cannot be the cause of homosexuality. This argument is based on natural selection, the fitness cost of genes ‘for’ homosexuality being too great for its occurrence at a frequency above that of random mutation (~ 1 in 50,000). The argument assumes that evolution would have largely eliminated homosexuality related to non-infectious environmental causes, except novel ones.”

        This actually jibes well with “It’s the Woo”‘s thesis as well. In other words homosexuality isn’t genetic. It is environmental. So isn’t it interesting Mr. Nikoley that the bien-pensant believe racial differences are environmental and that homosexuality is genetic, when in fact the opposite is more likely true?

        After all if homosexuality isn’t genetic, and it is indeed the result of environmental conditions, then a secular materialist like yourself would have to conclude that a “healthier” environment would result in less homosexuality. Let me phrase it in a way your readers might understand. “Excessive Omega 6 Cause of Queerness!” “Wheat, Cause of Limp Wristedness” Get it?

      • Steve W on February 12, 2013 at 19:19

        And finally Women’s suffrage. From Vox Day:

        Another feminist myth exploded

        The notion that equal access to higher education was going to cause a flowering of female intellectual achievement was always false, because it observably didn’t happen the first time around.

        “Although the fact is not widely known, the ratio of male-to-female undergraduates in the United States was about at parity from 1900 to 1930. Male enrollments began to increase relative to female enrollments in the 1930s and later as GIs returned from World War II. A highpoint of gender imbalance in college attendance was reached in 1947 when undergraduate men outnumbered women 2.3 to 1. But starting then and continuing until the present in an almost unbroken trend, female college enrollments have increased relative to male enrollments. 
        In other words, elite women were attending university in equal numbers to elite men, but more middle-class and working-class men going to college threw the balance out of whack.  Middle-class women followed suit, and the consequent collapse in national demographics caused the replacement of 60 million aborted natives with 60 million alien immigrants.”

        Brilliant.  Just brilliant.  Short of poisoning the water supply or dropping a large quantity of nuclear weapons on the major cities, it would be hard to concoct a more efficient means of crippling a nation.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 20:00

        No Steve, nonsense (the conclusion). And incidentally, I’ve read 10,000 year and agree with Cochran and Wooo. I think I wrote genetic somewhere but meant it as a generic “natural causes” thing.

        Homosexuality has always been around, just like a host of other things. In essence, we’re talking personality and personalities are vastly different, a function of neuron formation in early age. You’re cherry picking one single personality trait and assigning causes to it which is beyond ridiculous.

        It’s more wrong than a very wrong thing.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 20:03

        And here we go again. Facts and data (college is going to go out of style in the way we know it anyway) used to support silly, hand wringing conclusions.

        You could take back all the public money spent on immigrants who’d arrived in the last 40 years and it wouldn’t put a dent in the national debt.

      • Steve W on February 15, 2013 at 09:24

        “Homosexuality has always been around, just like a host of other things.”

        Um hey “Mr. Science”, this is clearly falsified in that contact has been made with tribal peoples who have no concept and no experience with homosexuality. The researchers had a difficult time even explaining the concept. I imagine the tribal people poking there index fingers together and shaking their heads…

        So no, you are wrong.

        A ‘healthier’ evolutionary environment leads to fewer, or in the case of the link, no homosexuals at all.

      • Steve W on February 15, 2013 at 09:28

        “You could take back all the public money spent on immigrants who’d arrived in the last 40 years and it wouldn’t put a dent in the national debt.”

        Depends on your calculations. It is numerically demonstrable that the amount of wealth transfered in the twentieth century (via taxes, i.e. theft) from whites to non-whites (both world wide and in Amerika) is in the tens of trillions.

        Would you be surprised if the tax receipts demonstrated this?

      • Richard Nikoley on February 15, 2013 at 11:00

        “So no, you are wrong.”

        No, I’m right. Homosexuality has always been around. Always. So has idiocy, apparently.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 15, 2013 at 11:01

        “Depends on your calculations”

        No, it doesn’t. It’s a categorically true statement of fact.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 19:48

        Derb’s quote is no justification of racism or xenophobia. It’s actually a good thing. I like that humans have diverged somewhat.

        I don’t support “affirmative action” for anyone at any time, anywhere, so I have no idea what you’re on about. Affirmative action destroys people and individuals. Stop it. In fact, stop all aid to everywhere. There are many people of influence in Africa begging the world to stop sending aid. I agree. Not one penny should flow in at all. I’d probably make an exception for a natural disaster, but that’s about it.

      • Steve W on February 15, 2013 at 09:11

        Nikoley, “Derb’s quote is no justification of racism” Who said that it was? (btw this post was full of assumptions on your part, in order for you to act big, tough and smart – whatever…)

        My entire thesis has been that the anti-statist, scientific/rationalist, anarcho-libertarianism approach to societal organization that we both espouse is found no where else (in appreciable measure) outside of Europe and Anglo-sphere.

        Is it really an irrational question then, to ask: If anti-statist, scientific/rationalist, anarcho-libertarianism is found only as a sub-culture of whites, and whites (in the blink of an evolutionary eye) will soon be gone, then shouldn’t we as anti-statist (etc.) be concerned about demographics?

        Additionally big government and big business both have an interest in flooding the nation with immigrants. I’m not a conspiracy minded man by nature, but c’mon.

      • Steve W on February 15, 2013 at 09:47

        “I like that humans have diverged somewhat.” Don’t you get it man? This is today’s dictionary definition of racism.

        You, Richard Nikoley are a racist!

        And today there is no greater sin. In fact there is really no other taboo on par with the scientific conclusion that racial differences in personality, temperament, future time-orientation, etc. etc. are the ‘primary’ result of genetics/evolution.

        Also ironic, in that you appear to have gone on for months battling the ‘misogynist’ misnomer and then turn right around and apply the same fallacious reasoning in this post.

        Nothing I’ve said, nothing, indicates hate or violence. Nothing.

        Again Mr. Nikoley, is it rationale for white people (especially anti-statists), based on history and science, to lament (and yes fear) their own people’s genocide/suicide?

      • Richard Nikoley on February 15, 2013 at 10:56

        “My entire thesis”

        Your entire thesis hasn’t a single thing to do with anarchism.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 15, 2013 at 11:04

        “Richard Nikoley are a racist! ”

        Just STFU now. Go away, too. Permanently. You are no longer welcome in my comments. I’m sure you have no more respect for property rights than you do fo self-determination regardless of skin color, but it is nonetheless my request to never hear another thing from you for the remainder of my life.

      • Jscott on February 12, 2013 at 20:37

        Define the achievement gap.

      • Steve W on February 15, 2013 at 09:12

        Define the achievement gap? (As if this is some meta-physical rhetorical device!) Both left and right agree that that an “achievement gap” in wealth and scientific achievement exists between whites and non-whites. The disagreement lies in to what extent the gap is predicated on nature (genetic) or nurture (environmental).

        Doug provides a nice overview of the achievement gap…

        White people — White men, in fact — created the modern world, from soup to nuts. The Japanese did some tweaking, but that’s the best any other race has managed to do.
        A White man invented the first mass-production printing press, which unlike Chinese attempts had an immediate transformative effect: the mass circulation of affordable books, pamphlets, and journals right across Western and Central Europe. White men created science as we know it: as a unified, systematic study of nature — a staggering accomplishment made possible by Gutenberg’s printing press. For use in their scientific investigations, White men developed advanced mathematics, not to mention the first precision timepieces.
        White men carried out the industrial revolution, a turning point in history that led to unprecedented improvements in the living standards of the masses of ordinary people — the so-called “99 percent.” White men invented the steam engine and used it to develop industrial mass production and the first locomotive. They invented the diesel engine and used it to develop the diesel locomotive and passenger and freight ships made of steel. They invented the internal combustion engine and used it to develop the automobile.
        White men were the first to drill for petroleum and refine it into fuel — gasoline and kerosene and diesel and jet fuel — not to mention all its other uses, like plastics and asphalt (used any today?) and the fertilizers and pesticides that modern agriculture depends on.
        White men invented the telegraph and created the first high speed, long range communications systems, spanning continents and soon the globe. They invented the telephone, wireless radio, and television. They invented photography and motion pictures; record players and video cameras. They invented electric generators, electric motors, and electric lights, based on a theory of electricity due entirely to White men.
        White men invented the airplane and the jet airplane. They created rockets and used them to launch satellites into Earth’s orbit. Those satellites gave us instantaneous global communication, global weather and climate monitoring, unprecedented surveying ability, and a Global Positioning System free for every man and woman of every race and nation to use — with a receiver invented by White men, of course.
        White men have traveled hundreds of thousands of miles through space to the Moon, and back safely to Earth, in rockets invented by White men, using guidance and communications systems designed and built by White men, based on science and mathematics created by White men. They have explored the other planets of our solar system and discovered the origins of our world and our universe, using telescopes and spacecraft they designed and built, and they have freely shared that knowledge with all mankind.
        White men invented the transistor, the computer, and the Internet. They invented solar power, wind power, and nuclear power. They developed scientific medicine — the only kind that works — and discovered virtually every effective treatment, vaccination, and cure, from penicillin to radiation therapy. They created modern mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, anthropology, and archaeology.
        In fact, it is difficult to think of anything of great significance in the modern world that wasn’t created by White men. (For the record, and not to bash any other race, nearly all the supposed Black inventions are myths, like gas masks, traffic lights, blood banks, and peanut butter.)
        The most beautiful art, the most sublime music, was created by White men, from ancient Greece to the Middle Ages to the Renaissance and beyond. (No, rap music doesn’t count.)
        White men invented democracy and created the first democratic republics. They didn’t invent slavery, obviously, but they were the first to abolish it. They were also the first to ban torture as a form of criminal punishment. With the founding of the United Nations, White men led the world to the first-ever international agreement prohibiting aggressive war, a prohibition enforced by White men. White men developed the entire concept of human rights, and have always led the world in safeguarding those rights.
        As I think I mentioned, White men gave us the scientific revolution, then the industrial revolution, which rivals the agricultural revolution in its transformational power. For the first time in history, humanity can escape Malthusian misery and mass death, and the populations of entire countries can live safe, comfortable lives, thanks to the work of White men.
        I could go on.
        Maybe the world should designate one day out of the year to give thanks to White men and all the wonderful things they have done for the benefit of all humanity.
        Yeah, like that would ever happen!

      • Richard Nikoley on February 15, 2013 at 10:58

        “Both left and right agree”

        So what.

  2. Gabriella Kadar on February 9, 2013 at 12:41

    Actually, on the topic of trans-racial, today was interesting. I figured since the snowfall ceased, the roads would be reasonable. I hadn’t counted on the multi-ethnic multi-racial parking lot drama behind Sunny supermarket. So this is not neo-xenophobia here, it’s just neo because basically everyone present are probably recent immigrants to Canada. This neighbourhood is the most multi everything in the entire country. I love it but sometimes there are challenges.

    Okay, so visualize this: under normal circumstances there is a parking lot with cars parked at 90 degrees to the roadbed. Stall parking on either side of the roadway. Under normal circumstances there is usually just enough space for two cars to pass one another in the driveway portion of the parking lot. With all the snow, none of the parked cars can occupy the parking stall spots to the full length of the stall because there’s heaped up snow. Which also, btw prevents people from walking close to the wall of the supermarket.

    Lucky me, I got a spot very close to the end of the parking lot.

    But as I was walking towards the store, there were about 5 cars facing east and 5 cars facing west all trying to get through which was spatially absolutely (in this case appropriate) impossible. Two cars could not ever pass by one another side by side. Someone with a bit of brains (clearly no one fits the description) should have put up a one way and no entry sign at either end of the parking lot, but did not.

    So here we go: Jamaican lady gets out of an eastbound car and starts yelling at the row of westbound drivers to back up. The westbound drivers are sitting in their cars either not comprehending or ignoring. She was going on and on ‘back up, back up, back up’ louder and louder but she didn’t take any physical steps towards any of the westbound cars. Meantime the southeast Asian drivers and the Chinese drivers got out and from different directions started to yell at one another. This is a big deal I’ve noticed many times in the store as well. The Chinese and the Muslims will not give an inch and their communication styles clash.

    I went into the store and hoped like heck that when I finished shopping, maybe it would be a reasonable process for me to leave.

    Of course I had to beep my horn numerous times for the Indian subcontinent driver with his wife in car to move forward a few feet (he had loads of space) so I could back out. Then I just proceeded to continue to back out, inch by inch, stay on message here Kadar, no application of brakes but inch inch inch backwards to indicate to the only two cars blocking my way to move the hell back. They got the message. Car number 2 took the fuck off because there was loads of space. Car no. 1 grudgingly gave space. You’d think he’d be overjoyed to give space since my parking spot was only the third in from the end therefore limiting his having to repeat the ‘go back’ message in future that I was giving him. But nah. Nevertheless, I backed up and backed up until I got the hell out of there. Phew.

    One thing I’ve noticed is that if ‘whitey’ (me) somehow inadvertently gets in the way of a central African shopper (female) I get shot a look of hostility and deep disgust. There is zero tolerance on the part of the Africans towards whitey. No one else behaves like that.

    Is this racist? NO it’s not. Well, it’s probably racist on the parts of the African women. On my part it’s just observation. There’s people from everywhere in the world shopping at Sunny. It’s interesting to see how everyone manages to somehow negotiate the shopping experience with everyone else.

    There was a Roma woman on her cellphone at the checkout, other lane. Honest to God, these people speak so quickly that I didn’t actually catch that she was speaking in Hungarian until she repeated one word over and over again. But even then, I couldn’t make out what she was on about. Roma talk really really fast.

    The parking lot at Iqbal Halal supermarket also had its challenges. But since everyone is ‘sister’ and ‘brother’, there were no antagonistic incidences.

    Aw, just love your posting Richard.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 13:34

      Great story. Yep, the clashes are going to happen and in the very vast majority of instances, they are going to figure out how to work it out.

      Another alternative.

      • Gabriella Kadar on February 9, 2013 at 14:26

        That brought tears to my eyes. I guess his wife is off working someplace overseas. Maybe.

        I see lots of people from the Philippines around here. They have close family relationships, work so hard, live frugally and cook real food. They are not whiners and complainers that’s for sure. The guy in the video had so much self respect despite what most of us would consider to be a totally disappointing situation. He sees the positives of his life. Something to learn that’s for sure. I love what the other guy said about exercise with money. Their glasses are at least half full.

        I love living here. My neighbours are from everywhere. The mentality and attitude of these people is what I see everyday. Except in the parking lot but that’s just plain old chuckle-worth.

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 9, 2013 at 14:29

        Thanks to the anything goes/open borders crowd, our future will soon resemble the overcrowded and impoverished streets of Manila. Where homeless squatters pushing trolley cars on private rail lines constitutes a transportation breakthrough. Never-mind that it’s illegal and dangerous.

        It’s ironic, the reason Filipinos immigrate to the West is precisely because they want to get the hell away from stifling squalor and corruption.

        To state the obvious, Europeans create European societies, Third Worlders create Third World societies.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 17:08

        Yea, I’m sure, Earl. Any day now. Laf.

      • Elenor on February 10, 2013 at 08:00

        Cannonbear: “To state the obvious, Europeans create European societies, Third Worlders create Third World societies.”

        Richard, you don’t think he’s correct? You don’t think the absolute tidal wave of immigrants, RE-creating their homelands here in the States (or in Europe), is actual? Do you ever drive around the barrios in LA? Those neighborhoods are NOT “America” — they are Mexico (or Guatemala or pick your SAmer state) moved north – and re-creating what they left behind, by chasing out what was the local White/Euro culture/peoples). Go to Florida, where the Cubanos want to institute the SAME censorship and govt-al systems they moved away from in Cuba.

        How about the attempts to institute Sharia in cities and towns in America and Canada (and of course Europe)? They want to LEAVE their own countries — just to recreate them here?! Isn’t that crazy? They want to create and enforce ‘ways of living’ that are NOT congruent with White European society and peoples. (You may also notice they do not afford the same ‘grace’ to European-derived peoples in their countries!)

        Gabriella gets a chuckle out of the loss of the White Euro more’s, courtesies, and ways of interacting with the people around us. Alas that White Euros have been ?? taught? raised? brainwashed? to be, or are perhaps innately (like a cowbird’s ‘host parents’?) too-openly supportive of their neighbors — a effective and useful tactic in a homogeneous tribal society — a totally destructive tactic with modern deracinated hordes.

        “We are all brown”? What ‘all-brown’ society has EVER been in the forefront of charity and helping after disaster (or even with not creating the ‘normal disastrous’ living patterns of other peoples) and/or, yes, the economic assault and control of other peoples/societies? (We whites are neither angels nor devils!) What ‘all-brown’ society has ever created the technology and societal structures that make (Europe and) NAmerica such a beacon to them all? And how long do you think those technologies and societal structures will REMAIN once the White Euro culture disappears under the tidal wave?

        Did the “whites-no-go zones” in France exist when you were there? Did you ever go try to see them? Or the white-no-go (including no-police!) zones now present in Norse countries — where it’s rape-open-season on WHITE women by the Third Worlders who were welcomed in by the whites? “We” may all be brown in your (truly odd) view — but the “already-browns” do not think that way, view us that way, or wish to play with the people around them the way our disappearing culture does.

        Homo sapiens sapiens is a CULTURE-bearing animal. If you destroy the culture (by dilution, by “P.C.” lawmaking, by any of a number of trends and attacks that are destroying White Euro culture) — then you lose a precious part of the world’s much-vaunted “diversity.” Why is it only white countries that “must” be diversified? Why is it only whites must be more loyal to other races/cultures/peoples than to their own? Why do you seemingly rejoice in the destruction of a totally legitimate ‘subspecies’ of the human animal?

        If we were discussing the extinction of, say, the Mexican Red Wolf by an influx (or worse, intentional importation!) of the ‘regular’ grey wolf — would you be so sanguine?

      • Mary on February 10, 2013 at 11:40

        You are still a voice of sanity here Eleanor, good work by a good woman 🙂

        Ps: The Picard ‘facepalm’ has long been an “internet meme” Richard, you are far from the first to use it like this, lol, ….sorry 😉

      • chris on February 10, 2013 at 14:00

        It’s a shame that there are this “white no-go zones”. For years there were “blacks no-go zones”, “brown no-go zones”, “native no-go zones”, and now “white no-go zones” as well…

        It’s hatred. Groups of people interested in building hatred. And the pre-hatred start with discourses similar to yours. The not white races had suffered that hatred much worse. much much worse. Still happens in a much small scale (but its difficult to see for people who are building hatred inside them).

        This hatred or dislike expressed by “browns” started with discourses about victimization of brown people along with smalls acts of discrimination by a couple of idiots and perceived or unintentional discrimination, exagerated by the media.
        And now the “whites” are doing the same (with the exception of the media).

      • chris on February 10, 2013 at 14:18

        in the end is just plain and vulgar demagogy.
        i seen it here. i seen it there.
        just a tiny handful of people see the problem whitout exagerating or promoting hatred, prejudices and/or stereotypes in a destructive way.

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 10, 2013 at 14:52

        Richard is not like you and I Elenor.

        You see, he lives an enchanted life free from the daily grind.

        We on the other hand have to contend with the alienation and hostility that defines today’s diverse multiracial society.

        He has the luxury of taking vacations up to his villa in the mountains as he pleases, breathing in the fresh air and savoring his Glenfarclas while pontificating about open borders and the free flow of people from all corners of the earth.

        We poor slobs have to go to work everyday and contend with the traffic, overcrowding and pollution his musings represent in the real world.

        When the plebes protest he pats us on the head and reassures us that everything will work out just fine in the long run.

        In the long run we’re all dead but our children will have to deal with the consequences of his poorly conceived utopian visions.

      • A.B. Dada on February 10, 2013 at 14:54

        Everything will work out in the long run.

        80% of any large economic population are serfs, the so-called plebes.

        There is nothing anyone can do to make life better for them, other than giving them better breads and circuses.

      • MC on February 10, 2013 at 19:50


        It’s wealthy politicians, government officials, lawyers, lobbyists, bankers, the military industrial complex, corporations in bed with government, and socialist/fascist government, people with “good” intentions, and welfare advocates, that are the true problem of this country. Not the recipients of their regulations, laws, and “charities.”

        The government always causes problems, with problems that they purportedly set out to solve.

        Thomas Sowell, a black man, in this video, spells out what’s wrong with welfare, and the effect on blacks it has had. It’s a short video, and he’s debating a white woman, as that might be relevant to our discussion.

        Third world conditions are the result of policy plus time. America maintains it’s first world status through the use of money printing, and countries like China are holding themselves back to support a dead America. China will be the next “America.” Americans will start to become the immigrants.

        This is the fault of government.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 10, 2013 at 20:22

        Duh, Mary.

        Now go Google JLPF, tell me what you come up with. Which was the point. Of course. Oh, “aware” one.

      • Galina L. on February 11, 2013 at 06:08

        Sometimes it looks like “white” people behave in a fashion like they are afraid to say something to a person of another race out of fear it would be perceived as a racist behavior. I remember once group of guys in a black neighborhood surrounded me and guys began to yell how I couldn’t walk around here because of being white. They lost interest in a confrontation somehow when they found out I spoke with a foreign ascent. Obviously, I didn’t stand there with my mouth shat close.
        On another occasion a train worker who was black was sitting people on an Amtrak train in a Washington, DC in a situation when more tickets were sold than places available. So, some had to go to sit in a restaurant carriage, others into normal comfortable carriage. I was standing in a line with other passengers. The Amtrak worker started to select black people out of the passengers line in order to put them in a more comfortable accommodation. I asked him calmly to explain what kinds of privileges the selected guys had over others, everybody was surprised, the worker started to laugh uncontrollably. No explanations were given, I was placed in a comfortable sit. I decided not to press further. I got what I needed. If others choose to be obedient sheep, it was not my business.
        I an not a racist, I have no reason to feel guilty about black people being mistreated earlier in a history. It is not the only outrageous page in a human history.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:16


        I just don’t know what to tell you. Slums and shantytowns populated by all races and cultures have always existed everywhere. People have been “attempting” things that effect other people since the dawn of time. Races and cultures have clashed since the dawn of time. In the modern age, the ability to migrate rapidly as opposed to a process that might take generations, no culture is “safe.” And somehow, people manage to muddle through it all.

        Since Spiro Agnew first uttered “America, love it or leave it” and before, people talk as though they own the place. That’s really what comes through. You have this underlying notion that this is YOUR America and the America of white Euros.

        I on the other hand, simply recognize and deal with the reality that none of this is controllable, not even on a national policy scale. It just is what it is.

        Saw this, this morning, on George Takei’s FB, I think.

        There goes the neighborhood. Get over it.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:47

        “Richard is not like you and I Elenor.”

        Wow, at least two logical fallacies in one statement:

        – argumentum ad populum (that people similarly situated think and/or act alike)

        – correlation equals causation (that a person’s situation is the cause of the ideas they hold)

        That’s off the top of my head. Any others?

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:50

        “When the plebes protest he pats us on the head and reassures us that everything will work out just fine in the long run.”

        That’s exactly what I don’t do, ever. What I do do is assert that you can’t fool or overcome reality in the long run. Your choice is to deal with it and have everything work out just fine or very bad, or ignore it and have everything work out worse.

        There are no guarantees. My forever message is simple: just take your chances.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 08:55

        Thanks MC.

        A video with Mr. Brilliant (Sowell), sporting a fro, no less, with bald Milton sitting on the sidelines smiling, was just classic.

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 10:44

        Does Mary have a blog? Anything that leads to context about what she/he/it is about? That the majority of commenters espousing these WhiteWashed beliefs are anonymous-both here and on their own playground-is sketchy.

        Fear is not a great selling point to any carnival.

        “Duh, Mary.”

        “Now go blog JLPF, tell me what you come up with. Which was the point. Of course. Oh, “aware” one.”

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 11:48

        “We poor slobs have to go to work everyday and contend with the traffic, overcrowding and pollution his musings represent in the real world.”

        Learned helplessness. Less time commenting on blogs and more time honing a different skill set would be too sensible I suppose?

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 13:04


        I miswrote. Should have been “Google JLPF.” By new Internet meme, I meant JLPF, instead of linking to the various images everyone has been doing for some time now.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 13:10

        “Learned helplessness. Less time commenting on blogs and more time honing a different skill set would be too sensible I suppose?”

        Laziness begets envy, and now there’s an Internet to commiserate with all the other lazy, disaffected enviers. Its Fun, and they even get to pretend they’re “enlightened” and “aware.”

        But what’s happening really is that other races from other countries all over the world are kicking white ass all over the playing field and I love it.


        Get off your pathetic, privileged, protected white asses and show us what you’re made of, or continue to get your asses kicked to my general delight.

        I’ve always gone for the underdog, but the problem is I might have to switch soon. Looks like my white brethren are pretty doomed for because they tend to want to roll back the clock, invoke protections and privileges, and not come to grips with the obvious fact that the world has changed and will continue to do so, as a more rapid pace.

      • Shelley on February 11, 2013 at 13:59

        @MC – thanks for a very young Sowell video! I’m shocked to think we looked like that in 1980, and here I thought I was cool looking.

        It’s a good thing we didn’t shut the borders on him, he is an absolutely brilliant man and we need more of the likes of him!

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 15:01


        Meh, I got that. I was just using your “Mary…go blog about it” to highlight the fear based belief system that encourages holders of the belief to largely be anonymous posting here and even on their own sacred hang-out spots. In the words of a rapper, “Bump that noise.”

        Richard said:

        I miswrote. Should have been “Google JLPF.” By new Internet meme, I meant JLPF, instead of linking to the various images everyone has been doing for some time now.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 18:07

        And you know, Earl, for all of the xenophobia of the last couple of hundred years, even the third world immigrants can’t seem to just let predictions come through.

        But yea, it’s different this time, right?

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 9, 2013 at 20:21

        “When one follows individuals rather than statistical groups defined by income, one finds that, on average, the rich got a little richer and the poor got much richer.”

        This is misleading.

        The article only looks at the decade from the late 70s to the late 80s. Ask any blue collar worker today and they’ll tell you economic mobility has drastically worsened in the past 20 years. Indeed, over 6 million manufacturing jobs have been lost in that time frame because of unfettered and irresponsible free trade policies. Gone are the days when low skilled American workers could find high paying jobs in manufacturing industries. They’ve all been shipped overseas to low cost third world sweat shops.

        Furthermore the referenced article does adequately describe these individuals. Were they young people just getting started on their careers? What percentage of individuals was that? How many were businessmen or farmers who had a bad year?

        Richard, why is the middle class bailing out of California? If the dream of a multiracial highly mobile and prosperous society was going to materialize anywhere it would have been there.

        I know, it’s all the Governments fault, high regulation, etc.

        But isn’t that putting the cart before the horse? Prior to throwing the doors open to the worlds poor shouldn’t those who advocated theoretical Libertarian ideals have dismantled the welfare state first? Good luck doing that now. The game is over. Try electing even a small “c” fiscal conservative in a climate where over half the electorate is receiving government benefits.

      • Jscott on February 9, 2013 at 23:37

        (This is not a proper response. I am tempted to use logic. I won’t)

        Dude, do more art. Paint something. Draw something. Write a poem everyday for a month and leave the poems for people to find.

        Your children will figure it out so fucking LIVE!

      • Mary on February 10, 2013 at 11:47

        “Your children” (our descendants) are destined to becoming despised minorities in our own lands thanks to mass non-White immigration and treasonous anti-White actions by spineless politicians who care for nothing but their own short-term enrichment.
        I am sure your callous words will be of little comfort as “your children” have to worry more and more about stories like this becoming their fate:

        During his testimony Wednesday, Thandiwe suggested that his reason for even purchasing the gun he used in the shootings was to enforce beliefs he’d developed about white people during his later years as an anthropology major at the University of West Georgia.
        b>“I was trying to prove a point that Europeans had colonized the world, and as a result of that, we see a lot of evil today,” he said.
        “In terms of slavery, it was something that needed to be answered for. I was trying to spread the message of making white people mend.”
        He said the night before the shooting, he attended a so-called “Peace Party” intended to address his concerns about helping the black community find equal footing, but two white people were there.
        “I was upset,” Thandiwe said. “I was still upset Friday. I took the gun to work because I was still upset from Thursday night.”
        He even admitted to earlier that day getting angry enough on the job to shoot his supervisor.
        “What my boss said to me …,” he told the jury, “that rage almost made me pull out my gun on him.” A collective groan went up from the victims’ family members when Lee announced early Wednesday afternoon that she would allow a mental health expert to examine Thandiwe overnight and testify the next day as to whether there was sufficient evidence to add an insanity verdict to the jurors’ choices.

        Read it all @ source.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:34

        “Ask any blue collar worker today and they’ll tell you economic mobility has drastically worsened in the past 20 years. Indeed, over 6 million manufacturing jobs have been lost in that time frame because of unfettered and irresponsible free trade policies. Gone are the days when low skilled American workers could find high paying jobs in manufacturing industries. They’ve all been shipped overseas to low cost third world sweat shops.”

        Boo Hoo. Welcome to the real world where there’s a market for labor. If someone can produce the same thing for less money, that’s who’s going to end up producing it. Protectionism only goes so far and its eventual unintended consequences are always worse than had people simply dealt with the realities on the ground in the first place.

        Private sector labor unions began as a way to get the various workers some bargaining power through solidarity. Fine. Not a bad idea. Then as the unions themselves grew, they got politically active, lobbying for all sorts of things to protect their membership from competition from others who would work for less. In other words, this was touted as protecting the livelihoods of the workers but the means were, a-prior and by definition, to create an _uncompetitive_ membership.

        So in the end, union workers in manufacturing became uncompetitive, both domestically and internationally, and that is simply going to come home to roost some day, and it apparently has, and that’s a good thing. I think it’s plain old justice. I don’t care about skin color, national origin or any of those things. If those “Yellow skins” can make it better, faster, cheaper, more power to them.

        Suck eggs, Americans. If you can’t beat ’em, don’t come crying to me.

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 08:10

        “your children” have to worry more and more about stories like this becoming their fate”

        That is because you see only two paths that diverge into the woods. I see multiple. I do not worry nor will my offspring (if they follow my path). After all, I am doing my part in merging the lines of “our descendants.” So, with that said, I am part of your problem.

        Though, you are not part of mine. Odd how that works out.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 08:12

        “I am sure your callous words will be of little comfort as “your children” have to worry more and more about stories like this becoming their fate:”

        Oh my goodness (not discounting the specific horror of the thing). A deranged madman does something totally mad and the explanation is not that he’s a deranged madman, but that white people are targets of racial hatred. Well, isn’t that special.

        Well, you know, since black people have been a part of America since their ancestors were hauled over on boats as slaves, I have a modest suggestion for the whole social-epistemological mending process the news media might help with.

        Next time an “ugly little black girl” gets abducted, how about they do endless, 24/7 new coverage on it? they could even photoshop all the photos to make people think it’s a blond & white girl.

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 11, 2013 at 11:25

        I didn’t expect you to give a shit about your fellow Americans, considering the “greed is good” and “selfishness is a virtue” ethos you subscribe to.

        Don’t know if you care about simple fairness either but I’ll give it a shot.

        Manufacturing industries in the US must comply with environmental laws. It may come as a surprise to the rest of the world but Western countries have a preference for clean air and water. We heavily invest in environmental conservation and protection and expect corporations to do the same. We’re kind of funny that way but there you have it.

        Western countries also frown upon worker exploitation, especially children. Call us crazy but we insist that corporations ensure safe work environments and we very much discourage employing kids in dangerous occupations.

        So unless you want to sweep away a hundred years of thoughtful legislation and transform the West into some polluted dirt-poor third world shit-hole, fairness and common decency dictates that mega-corporations who move operations offshore to escape our laws and regulations should see hefty tariffs slapped on their ass.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 12:55

        ….Earl. For 20 years I’ve been tossing peals before swine, so I guess once more won’t hurt me.

        Here’s goes: isn’t that nice for you, after all the decades and centuries of development. Better protect it. Better keep those undesirables of manufacturing anything, developing, learning similar lessons over time. After all, way back when, we were white and pristine, and things like cholera and the plague were just accidental aberrations that have nothing to do with it.

        “considering the “greed is good” and “selfishness is a virtue” ethos you subscribe to.”

        Uh huh.

      • Shelley on February 11, 2013 at 13:39

        “thoughtful legislation”

        **JLPF x 2

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 11, 2013 at 14:50

        Richard Nikoley quoting from the Sermon on the Mount.

        How is it that your keyboard didn’t burst into flames when you typed that?

      • Earl Cannonbear on February 11, 2013 at 16:22

        Hey peaches, if you have a problem with Western legislation that governs solid waste, clean air, clean water, safe drinking water, noise pollution ,hazardous materials, toxic substances, wetlands conservation, oil pollution and healthy forests may I suggest to pick up your sweet patootie and move it to Haiti or Mali? How about Mozambique or Zambia? If that don’t work for you try Burundi or Ethiopia.

        I’m sure they’ll love to have you.

      • shelley on February 11, 2013 at 17:17

        Peaches here…the state’s are drowning in “thoughtful legislation” so much that a small local business just cannot keep up with the new set of rules. Morals and ethics obviously are extremely important but in no way do we need the crippling effects of the legislation enforced by our federal government.

        You’re just like every other NIMBY who complains but I’m sure refuses to give anything up that enriches your own life.

        You are a hard pill to swallow and bitter at that.

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 19:33

        Do you even Ephesians 4:29 bro?

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 18:31

        After all, I am doing my part in merging the lines of “our descendants.” So, with that said, I am part of your problem.

        Ah, I didn’t realize you were Black upon first glance.

        So am I to understand you have children with a White woman?
        Muhammed Ali wouldn’t think much of your ‘upgrading strategy’:

        Uploaded on Jul 9, 2010
        Muhammad Ali talks about racial integration in USA; November 1971 on Parkinson, a British television chat show.


      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 18:33

        Who cares? if Muhammad Ali is a racist, then he’s as bad as you.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 18:57

        lol, you say “racist” like it’s a bad thing! There is nothing at all wrong with loving your own people Richard, I hope you can make peace with whatever has you blocked from loving yours .

        Ps: Modern day meaning of “racist” by one who means it as an insult :

        “shut up”


      • Jscott on February 12, 2013 at 19:09

        Mary said:

        Ah, I didn’t realize you were Black upon first glance.

        So am I to understand you have children with a White woman?
        Muhammed Ali wouldn’t think much of your ‘upgrading strategy’:

        Your inability to discern correctly upon first glance is why I would not bet on you in a Race. I, however, judged accurately and will never bet on a strategy that has fear as a bedrock strategy.

        Under the bridge you go. You can come back when you uncloak. Until then, you are merely a troll.

      • A.B. Dada on February 12, 2013 at 19:13


        Please GTFO because you’re ruining my “most hated person on FTA” status.


        The Misogynagement.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 19:18

        Because I didn’t zoom in on your tiny picture at first glance now makes me a “troll”? Uh, yeah…sure.

        So anyways: you now refuse to clarify that (your aforementioned “merging”) which you were crowing proudly about only a few posts ago, remember?

        After all, I am doing my part in merging the lines of “our descendants.” So, with that said, I am part of your problem.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 19:41

        You’re not here to love, Mary, you’re here to build hatred, as all racists are really all about.

      • Jscott on February 12, 2013 at 19:42

        Because I didn’t zoom in on your tiny picture at first glance now makes me a “troll”? Uh, yeah…sure.

        Hyperlinks make the web. You are a dead end street. You provide no context. Don’t wanna give FTA Google power over your name/brand? I get that. Fine, develop a contextual character. You have not put in the effort in doing so. I am not a fan of effortless avatars.

        You stir the pot. Fun! I do it myself. However, you are a vapor. No weight. No ability to influence. That, is troll (son!).

        So anyways: you now refuse to clarify that (your aforementioned “merging”) which you were crowing proudly about only a few posts ago, remember?

        You did not ask for clarification. What you did was take off on shopping spree. Nothing wrong with that! I enjoy it. If you wanna get all share share then fine. Act like it and start utilizing skills to inquire.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 19:58

        No, it’s you who seemingly “hates” his own people and agitates for White Genocide (encouraging Whites to accept, even cheer on, the race-replacement campaign via mass non-White immigration into their own countries). Worse still, you’re a White man who tries to make the poison taste like honey with your nonsensical lines like “we are all Brown ” , etc. *eyerollz*

        Anyways, as we are going round in circles now, I will grant you your earlier wish that I “shut the fuck up” and those too of some others who want me to “Gtfo”.

        Sweet dreams boyz 😉

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 20:06

        Umm, wtf does any of this marshmallow fluff actually mean?

        You are the one putting it out there that you are “merging” your descendants, and I asked you straight out if by that cryptic line you mean you have children with a White woman? How much clearer can one be?
        You said it, you put it out there, but now you attempt to paint any questions about it as some intrusive move on my part?

        If you don’t want questions asked, then I guess you ought not have boasted about it on a open-comment blog, hey?

        Nite nite Mr. “Merger”.

      • Jscott on February 12, 2013 at 20:23

        Mary, Until you are ready to uncloak, there is no open. Want to stand up for your race/beliefs/ethics? Represent something. Until then, you are just a bold typed font.

        Your avoidance does not make you stronger…nor cuter, much to my chagrin. Dada might crave the most hated but I like the most doggish.

        No worries Mary. Richard has my email. Feel free to hit me up for that dinner and a drink.

      • Jscott on February 12, 2013 at 20:26

        And you do not keep your word. You said you were leaving. You did not. You like biting the bait of lots of brown men Mary. That says something.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 21:50

        “No, it’s you who seemingly “hates” his own people and agitates for White Genocide (encouraging Whites to accept, even cheer on, the race-replacement campaign via mass non-White immigration into their own countries).”

        Typical lying bullshit. It’s not “white genocide” when whites decide they wish to marry and produce offspring with a non-white. And there is no campaign. It ought neither be specifically encouraged, nor discouraged. You are discouraging it and I suspect, support State force to prevent these sorts of families.

        “Worse still, you’re a White man who tries to make the poison taste like honey with your nonsensical lines like “we are all Brown ” ”

        Another lie. It’s simply a recognition of the homogenized endpoint if everyone is left to marry whom they wish, not subject to the sort of force you appear to agitate for (otherwise, why even bring it up?).

        My wife’s full hispanic niece is a Stanford grad (full academic scholarship, honors grad in biology). After working for a medical firm for a few years evaluating high value talent for hire, she now does hiring of software engineers for Google. She married a lilly white guy of Irish ancestry, I think (Cahalen). Nathan is their son. Doing great, and he has dark hair and brown skin. What a disaster, eh?!

        I guess you’d put a stop to that sort of tawdry behavior.

        See, it’s important for readers to differentiate between my position and that of racists like you and Earl. I’m simply saying: no force. Don’t subsidize either. No public dole, or anything of the sort. You are advocating for force.

        Leave people alone and over time, though I have no idea how much, all of the divergence that happened out of Africa and migrating to all corners of the globe and being separated for tens of thousands of years will begin the process of convergence (already has begun on many levels, foremost trade and business). It’s not that I _care_, really, in terms of making it happen or encouraging it. I only care about the use of force to stop people and if you don’t stop them I think the convergence will continue and someday, everyone will be brown. Maybe different shades of brown, so people like you will still have something to raise a stink about.

        I hear there are races of blacks where there are dozens of classifications of different skin color and they have names for them and people are treated differently. I suppose you’d call it inneracism or something. So there may be some hope for your kind anyway. See? No need to wring hands about it.

      • Mary on February 13, 2013 at 07:59

        I’ve noted your new tactic of slandering anyone who speaks up for a pro-White position as being “lazy” “unskilled” and “jealous” as well as “privileged”, etc. Such blatant horseshit.
        But this is really rich, given our current reality:

        You are advocating for force.

        Force? Who are the ones being made to tow the multicult/feminist line under “force”? Again and again I point out the very real White people doing jail time and having their lives ruined for speaking out against this anti-White system. Most people have no idea there are so many Europeans ( and many Canadians btw, inserted for the benefit of the clueless Gabriela )–and why do you think we hear so little of these stories? Who does run the Mass media? It doesn’t take much reading around to understand what’s afoot.

        Media saturated with race-mixing imagery , (MTV for example aimed especially at young Whites), is one arm of this assault, but also includes the anti-White “lessons” being taught in many of the Universities of the West, the fruits of which we saw recently in the story I posted about the cretin in Atlanta murdering a young White woman , and shooting two others, in order to “teach Whites to mend” our ways. You ignored that aspect of the story, of course, even though he told us what prompted his murderous spree. There is so much more that can be said, but I accept this is your blog and frankly, we have been down these roads already, haven’t we?

        Ps: lol@ your speaking of “my kind” as if you weren’t White.
        Sorry fate dealt you such a terrible blow Richard, making you a White man. What a burden you have been “forced” to bear.

        PPS: that wonderful natural ‘divergence’ you speak of can be seen live in Detroit via the exciting events of just the past few days. Enjoy:

        Videos @ source.

        Here’s what we do know: Hundreds of black people rampaged through downtown Detroit Saturday night: Breaking things. Beating up people. Throwing chairs inside restaurants. Threatening. Fighting. Running. Much of it on video.

        Police detained 76 black people, arresting only eight. The rest were released to their parents. Local news reporters could not tell whether this was just a “brouhaha” among some hooligans, or something more serious.

        People caught up in it had no trouble figuring it out.

        “I was scared for my life,” a waitress from American Coney Island restaurant named Melody told New 4 in Detroit. “They started slapping up our customers for no reason. A gang full of kids. Just came in here and started throwing chairs, acting crazy.”

        Neither did people who watched the video and saw police chase “hordes” of black people being all over downtown.

        The activity centered around the Motown Winter Blast, a collection of ice sculptures, skating, and entertainment all held outside. All to break the “Cycle of Poverty” and benefit a collection of Detroit social service agencies.

      • Shelley on February 11, 2013 at 13:19

        @Earl – “Thanks to the anything goes/open borders crowd, our future will soon resemble the overcrowded and impoverished streets of Manila.”

        Were we to close the borders right after you or your family arrived?

      • Shelley on February 11, 2013 at 13:21

        @Earl – ““greed is good” and “selfishness is a virtue” ethos you subscribe to”

        Please see question above because this comment seems to exemplify your comment above.

  3. Gabriella Kadar on February 9, 2013 at 15:44

    Earl, the people who came to North America lived in squalor back in Europe. (I’m referring here to people who came over at the turn of the 20th century or earlier). People who lived in comfort only had something to lose by emigrating so they stayed home. How else to explain that prairie farmers lived in a hole in the ground with some sort of roof covering? Think of the conditions in Ireland in the 1840s for example if you want to imagine dire. The Jews of Russia escaped from pogroms and squalor. My goodness, the examples are almost limitless. Look at Richard’s background: his father’s mother facilitated their escape from East Germany. Does Richard and his family live a dour Soviet style life? It’s all a matter of degree here isn’t it.

    After the first generation, people don’t usually live in third world conditions at all. They want what everyone else has and they usually achieve it.

    Clearly you saw something very different in that video than I did. But I’ve lived in a third world country and I’ve traveled (not touristed) and it’s remarkable how people who live in conditions we would consider absolutely untenable manage to put a genuine smile on their faces.

    My son in law went to India a couple of years ago to film the Rhesus monkeys for some programme on Animal Planet. He sent back photographs of how people live in the slums of Delhi. That was worse than anything I’d ever experienced. But it gave me a new perspective on how even here in Toronto, some people live in a way that I consider to be extremely substandard, but for these people even a dumpy apartment where they sleep on mats on the floor is already a luxury compared to what they left behind.

  4. Galina L. on February 9, 2013 at 20:25

    I remember reading a memoir of a person who lived several centuries ago in US and was a white person of a European descent abducted by Native People in the retaliation for one of their children being killed by whites, and raised as a member of a Native tribe. Much later during adulthood he left Indians and returned to White people because he got sick and tired from the hostility many native people were demonstrating to him for being ethnically like their enemies.After returning to Whites, he learned how to write and read and left the interesting book about his life.
    One of episodes in the book described how several families were living in one location , each family in separate wigwam, several were the norm wifes in each family because household duties were extremely labor-intense. One day a traveling member of a tribe came who happened to be a homosexual men . He asked to joined the household of the author of the memoir as another wife, but was refused, so he went to the next wigwam and was accepted. Other wifes accepted him with less than usual for such situation tension , they were also happy to have somebody who could carry female’s type of work with a male force.
    I read the book in my early 20-s, and it made to understand then that a homosexuality was a natural occurrence in a human population. Individual fertility was not everything. People survived in tribes and groups. Older members and trans-gender members also contributed to the reproductive success of other people from the same genetic pool.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 21:10

      Overt homosexuality has always and will always be part of the human spectrum. It does not surprise me in the least that primitive peoples would tend to accept that naturally. They were used to dealing with real things around them, as I outlined in my AHS presentation.

      Modern humans get their inferior “knowledge” from what they were taught, passed down by institutions and dutifully regurgitate, trying to make it look like they actually thought about it. All they really think about though, is how to spin it well.

      • Galina L. on February 11, 2013 at 06:22

        Yes, when people have real need, they have less itch to scratch their head and think what is right, and more ready for a compromise. Staying away from all compromises is the ultimate luxury. For example, people in US feel very strongly about being independent , while many would benefit overall from being helped by relatives at the cost of more dependence and feeling less proud. People in the situation that the Ladysadie found herself could be more better-of moving under the same roof with their relatives, but it is considered here as the absolutely last resort solution. I an not implying she should do it. Relatives could be not suitable for any support. I am talking about general situation.

  5. MC on February 9, 2013 at 21:37

    It’s not that I dislike masturbation, but I do think it’s probably overdone in our modern world. I imagine that 20,000 years ago if you saw a cavegirl strutting along, you would just walk up to her and seduce her. There was only so much language, only so much talking. There was only so much that existed to talk about, there was only so much to actually do.

    Her: So what do you do?

    Him: Mostly hunting. Usually for buffallo organs. You?

    Her: Oh, um gathering fruits, sweet potatoes, and firewood. Just like stuff I can find.

    That conversation wouldn’t even take place, and you’d probably know the girl since there are only so many people. Sex occurred probably more frequently and there wasn’t a process for getting a number, and calling later. There wasn’t working a 9-5. Unless you had an infectious disease or got mauled by a bear, seduction was a lot easier then our domesticated world.

    I’d bet if you were horny, it was easier to find a girl to fuck, whether from another tribe out gathering wood, or from your own tribe. Masturbation is a frequency of the domesticated animal.

    The first time I masturbated, not just touching my penis, actual orgasm (yes I’m sharing this). I was in grade 8, and I didn’t even know what masturbation was. I was watching the television and while flipping through the channels, it went to the playboy channel, which I didn’t know about, and a pretty naked girl was rolling around for no apparent reason, naked. I didn’t watch for long, because I was off to my room to make imagine my bed was the girl and make love to her.

    I actually thought I was going to pee, but it felt too good to stop. Expecting to find pee, I was shocked to find white stuff instead, and thought I broke my penis, until I remembered that “this must be that sperm stuff I learned about in class.”

    I actually didn’t learn that I could use just my hands to masturbate until about a year later, it was all humping until then. I probably would have kept with just the humping had it not been for it being late one night and I couldn’t hump quietly enough (bed makes noise), so I discovered how to use my hand. The humping was instinctive, not the hand.

    20,000 years ago I would’ve had sex with pretty naked girl. She wouldn’t have been on television, she would’ve been right there, ripe and for the taking. This domesticated “zoo” environment is the cause of most masturbation.

    In closing, have more sex. Free the animal.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 9, 2013 at 22:37


      It’s a great story, and courageous at that. Props, you animal.

      That said, primates masturbate using their hands. So that’s a kinda falsification in the general sense. I was I think about 19 the first time (but at least I did it the right way :). Very individual.

      Good news is, I’m 52 and only need reading glasses,

      • MC on February 10, 2013 at 01:57

        I actually thought I was like the only guy in the world to do it, from Grade 8 to Grade 12. I actually promised God I would stop. Never could keep the promise, which brought about feelings of guilt, and the eventual questioning of who/what God is.

        ‘That said, primates masturbate using their hands. So that’s a kinda falsification in the general sense.”

        Well besides not having a soft bed to hump, they probably masturbate more in zoos. More access to females in the wild unless another male fights them for access to pussy.

        My point is, if we were still living like we were in the wild, then I probably would have had sex with one of the girls working at the grocery store right in the health foods section. And who would need porn, if most of the girls were naked, healthy, fertile, just walking around? So not necessarily no masturbation, but probably much less of it.

        Still having some difficulty with this though:

    • Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 09:44

      MC: “she would’ve been right there, ripe and for the taking”

      The way you put it, sounds like rape. Is it?

      She may have family who find the ‘ripe for the taking’ business objectionable and put a blunt object through your skull. I mean, maybe even 20,000 years ago sexual congress may have been frowned upon if it wasn’t by mutual consent.

      Last night I was watching a BBC programme about the kurgan burials in the Altai of the Payzyk people. Of twenty graves, 10 bodies indicated death by violence. That’s from 2500 years ago or so. Not saying that these were sexually motivated or anything, just that the it appears that application of fatality inducing momentum happened at a high frequency.

      • Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 09:45

        typo: Pazyryk.

      • MC on February 10, 2013 at 13:31

        @Gabriella Kadar

        My responses start with ******

        “The way you put it, sounds like rape. Is it?”

        ****** No. It was analogous to eating and picking fruit. Hence the word “ripe.” The word “plump” could have made it clearer. Fruit wants to be eaten, it’s how fruit trees reproduce. If it had to do with sexual assault, I would have compared her to wheat, or a japanese puffer fish.

        “She may have family who find the ‘ripe for the taking’ business objectionable and put a blunt object through your skull. I mean, maybe even 20,000 years ago sexual congress may have been frowned upon if it wasn’t by mutual consent.”

        ****** Passively threatening me, and coming to conclusions isn’t the best way to ask a question.

        “Last night I was watching a BBC programme about the kurgan burials in the Altai of the Payzyk people. Of twenty graves, 10 bodies indicated death by violence. That’s from 2500 years ago or so. Not saying that these were sexually motivated or anything, just that the it appears that application of fatality inducing momentum happened at a high frequency.”

        ****** I will keep it in mind for those days I get all rapey and can’t control myself.

      • Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 14:57

        I guess your scenario could have been conveyed in a way that indicated the mutuality of desire.

        Wouldn’t it be more fun if she walked up to naked you and started to play with your throbbing member? The aphrodesia of being desired is most often way more powerful than being the desirer.

      • MC on February 10, 2013 at 16:04

        @Gabriella Kadar

        “I guess your scenario could have been conveyed in a way that indicated the mutuality of desire.”

        ****** That’s the only way it was conveyed. Anything else was your imagination getting away from you. I can give you a few quotes and keywords from what I wrote;

        “SEDUCTION was a lot easier then our domesticated world.”

        “imagine my bed was the girl and make LOVE to her.”

        “saw a cavegirl strutting along, you would just walk up to her and SEDUCE her.”

        “Wouldn’t it be more fun if she walked up to naked you and started to play with your throbbing member? The aphrodesia of being desired is most often way more powerful than being the desirer.”

        I prefer the girl desiring me, whiile I tease her. I believe girls prefer being teased as well instead of guys chasing them. But yes, definitely more fun :-]

      • Mountain Evan Chang on February 10, 2013 at 19:19

        I’m proud of and a bit shocked at how civil this exchange concluded. Bravo.

  6. A.B. Dada on February 10, 2013 at 10:53

    ItsTheWooo’s continued disparagement at my “bro-crinology” is hilarious, because she’s so wrong that there’s almost nothing to consider as a response to her.

    What I’ve said, what I’ve always said, is that my target audience are people who are hormonally healthy traditional gender-roled individuals, or those who have swallowed the modern blue pill but are aware that “something isn’t right here.”

    Such as the gal who grew up loving her dolls, playing tea time, playing with the Easy Bake Oven and the large plastic vacuum cleaner, but all of a sudden finds herself locked in a cubicle baking under fluorescent bulbs for 8-10 hours a day with only a rare break for free donuts in the lunch room.

    Or maybe it’s the guy who grew up playing cowboys and Indians, rough-housing with his brothers and classmates, pushing his body to build and destroy and climb trees and sprint across open fields but now finds himself with a distended belly, weak arms, and no sex drive to please his lady described above.

    I’m not even considering people with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, because they’re outliers. But the blue pill society causes the heteronormative hormonal-normative folks to have to “consider” the outliers because it’s sick and wrong to assume that healthy adults are generally very attuned to traditional gender roles and the behaviors and actions that those roles encompass for the two traditional genders.

    So she can verbally attack me, but all she is happens to be a nurse in an industry of continuing political correctness. Let her go off and help the transgendered and homosexual outliers — I have no desire and no history of success with that pack of folks.

    All she professes and teaches and spews about is somewhat irrelevant to me (I only pay attention so I know when to tell someone that I can’t give them any advice because they’re outside my market), and completely irrelevant to those who I teach to and learn from.

    Apples to oranges, but there are many many more apples than there are oranges, so I’ll focus on the apples.

    I’m not a xenophobe at all, I just have nothing relevant to offer those who are hormonal outliers due to birth, genetics, or prenatal problems that suppressed their ability to grow into hormonally healthy adults.

    One can only make some of the people happy all of the time, and all of the people some of the time. I prefer to focus on the first group in the old adage, and generally ignore the hard sciences that focus on the rarities. And maybe, just maybe, if some of the hormonally-healthy humans adopt a more traditional lifestyle, they can try to ameliorate some of the defects and damage that may lead to offspring with non-genetic disorders that are a function of unhealthy parents.

    Or, I could try to focus on the few and rare humans with 11β-Hydroxylase type 2 deficiency or aromatase excess or 3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase II deficient congenital adrenal hyperplasia or one of the possibly thousands of steroid metabolic dysfunctions that affect a tiny, tiny percentage of humans.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 10, 2013 at 11:51

      +1 ABD, a very well crafted entry.

      (I am pretty well convinced that you and Wooo would be pretty good friends IRL)

      • A.B. Dada on February 10, 2013 at 11:54

        Stream of consciousness, kindly ignore my grammar and spelling which were not honed in a accredited degree program.

      • A.B. Dada on February 10, 2013 at 11:57

        Oh, I’m sure we’d get along famously. The guys and dames I troll battle with online have all become people I visit with a few times a year. The guy I’ve spent the most IRL time with in 2012 is someone I met online who hated me here, but we’re famous trouble-makers down in Houston.

        We still keep up appearances online, of course.

    • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 17:26

      I never tell a man to be he-man.

      My rule for men who want to try out the traditional gender roles is to be dominant when she’s ovulating, and be soft and helpful when she’s bleeding buckets. That’s push-pull. And it works on women who seek traditional gender roles (although it seems to work on high status powerful women as in the kind I generally date, too).

      No man should be hypermasculine. I’m not. I love downtime with my girlfriend or lovers; I spend a lot of time with my closest male friends NOT doing aggressive super-masculine activities, too.

      But, I think we’ve reached a point in society where men are schlubbed and emasculated by all sorts of addictive rewarding behaviors (video games, alcohol, porn, iPods, etc) and that the man’s hormones are challenged because of all of these higher-reward behaviors (paucity of serotonergic and/or dopaminergic receptors, maybe?). I know my life became much better once I reduced my dependence on these behaviors and substituted slow-and-laborious activities in place. I did better in business, did better with women, did better with friends, did better financially.

      So I preached that guy should seek to down-play the instant gratification of modern living in exchange for putting some elbow grease into their lives. Once they do that, so many guys are telling me weeks and months later that they’re finally feeling in control.

      Then, I tell them to look for women who don’t have thrill-seeking behaviors. And guess what happens when they find those women?

      Healthy. Fucking. Relationships.

      Less drama (or none!), more joyous contentment, better sexual relationships, a strong division of labor within the relationship and the home, and no one is competing with the other for superiority since they’re doing what their hormones want to express in behavior, and they don’t have that dopamine deficiency/insensitivity that most people do.

  7. Ed on February 10, 2013 at 14:23

    LOLing at dada, who’s convinced that any woman who meets him is helpless against the power of his charm. And LOLing at his transparent attempts to reframe Wooo. He’s fled her blog where he is roundly mocked, and attacks her from here. I guess he’s hiding behind Richard’s skirts. Are skirts Paleo?

    Anyway, yes Wooo’s blog is fantastic. It’s one of the few I can still stomach. Probably because:

    – unlike almost everyone else, she actually was extremely obese, lost it all, and has kept it off.

    – unlike almost everyone else, she’s not trying to make a dime of her blog, Nor is she a narcissist trying to gain attention (she’s anonymous and doesn’t even list her blog on Google.)

    – unlike almost everyone else, she has an actual medical education, and works on a daily basis with the obese.

    – unlike almost everyone else, she says what she thinks without calibrating for trends or revenues, and she’s smart and funny in the process.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:24

      “He’s fled her blog where he is roundly mocked, and attacks her from here.”

      Then I guess I and everyone else fled as well, since the comment thread just seemed to naturally peter out. It happens.

    • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 08:15

      I didn’t flee her blog for any other reason than I wasn’t getting subscription updates about responses, and I sure am not going to sit on a blog and hit F5 to wait for replies. I hate blogspot blogs because it’s too complicated for me to remember what to do to get updates. With RN’s blog here, I can just click “Notify me of followup comments via e-mail” and I’ll pay more attention.

      1. I was obese (210# or so in 2002 or so) and now I’m not (145# lean). I didn’t follow any specific diet to get there, I tried numerous N=1 self studies and came up with some ideas. Friends asked me what diet I was on and I generally just said “real food”. This was in 2005 or so. The weight stays off now, no matter what I eat (although gluten/legume does send my stomach into a tizzy, so I avoid it).

      2. I agree, monetizing a blog generally is a bad way to show a pristine neutrality. I don’t want to be neutral, I want to be biased and I want to attract people who are sick of political correctness.

      3. I have graphic design friends who HATE that one of my T-shirt websites is doing gang busters because I didn’t go to school for design, I admit I am a terrible designer, and I sell the shirts at 50% cheaper than almost any other website, but it makes money (high 5 figures this year, I’m hoping). The same is true about the medical background — I have doctor friends on Facebook who are obese. I taunt fat doctors mercilessly, just like I shame fat nurses. I confused Wooo with CarbSane (I apologized for this a few blogs ago), I had no idea she was a slender nurse. My bad. Sorry, again, for the harm done from my lack of connection.

      4. I don’t know enough about her — again I confused her with CarbSane for some strange reason, for a VERY long period of time. I’ll try to follow her blog and see for myself.

      • Joshua on February 11, 2013 at 11:01

        Wow. Confusing Woo with CarbSane. That’s the craziest thing I’ve heard all day. Inasmuch as there is such a thing on the internet, those two are mortal enemies.

      • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 17:31

        It’s hard to shake that connection off. I have no idea why I thought you were one and the same, but I’ve thought it for months.

        And I do listen to women — in fact, women drive some of my greatest passion in diving into research and begging friends at medical school for PubMed articles in full.

      • Galina L. on February 11, 2013 at 17:41

        I have a guess why that mix/match could take place – ladies in question were included together in the famous “cunts” rant . Since Dada didn’t follow “insulin wars” (I am not implying he should), he had no idea that Wooo and Carbsane had any differences in opinion about anything, and mistook one person for another..

      • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 17:43

        Galina: Even though I don’t think we’ve interacted much, I recognize your posts because you at least include a real name. But all of these pseudonyms are just impossible to keep track of.

        I’ve been online since the late 80s, and pseudonyms were always equated to trolls. I haven’t been able to shrug that feeling off.

      • Galina L. on February 11, 2013 at 18:21

        I can’t blame people for being concerned about their privacy, and internet activity could have effects on real life. My son who is 20 years old was asked to put blogs he follows in his resume. Probably, in 80-s such concern was not as valid as now.

  8. Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 15:02

    Ed, A.B. Dada cares.

    I had to Google those rare genetic abnormalities. That’s what I love about the comments everywhere. It’s continuing education.

    Dada, take the II out of the 3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase II . It doesn’t exist with that nomenclature.

  9. Steve on February 10, 2013 at 15:09

    Is it possible that this type of hate is a neurological/ hormonal issue? In a sense, those who hate arrived there unconsciously or consciously but because of their genetics, are unable to move past it. Much like homosexuality, it is difficult to come out of the closet with this type of hate or view of the world and openly share it with family and friends because the haters tend to be outliers, rather than the norm.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 07:57

      “Is it possible that this type of hate is a neurological/ hormonal issue?”

      Possible, but why ascribe to complexity what can be understood simply: envy, laziness, or both.

      At least that’s what I see. I see people all around me who spend a good portion of their life capital operating from some premise or logic that “if I do A, I get B.” But then somewhere along the line the game changes and B is no longer on the table given only A exclusively. Rather than adjust to a new, ever rapigly changing landscape, figuring out where they went wrong, expanding their scope of thinking, as well as the playing field in which they can possibly operate, they get embittered, get envious, and often just get lazy and complain about it—blaming all manner of externatlities, avoiding all internals like the plague.

      It’s always someone else’s fault.

      • Steve on February 11, 2013 at 08:06

        I was just messing with Dada because he doesn’t have time for outliers, and I would consider him an outlier because of belief system. Following his philosophy, we shouldnt pay attention to the outliers.

      • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 08:20

        If I am an outlier, then I would assume my market base would plateau eventually. Since it grows every year, and my inbox is packed with people who seem to fit into the 80% heteronormative traditional gender role group, I can only assume I am not an outlier in this particular belief.

        I know my “political” humor is extremely outlying, and I know my work-play-fuck lifestyle is even more rare, but those are just endpoints that I think a lot of people would benefit from. I hold up both of those edge opinions as an example where a man can get to if he shakes off the blue pill mindsets of modern human mores and norms.

      • Steve on February 11, 2013 at 11:53

        Right that’s my point, Dada doesn’t care about the outliers, yet he himself may represent one since he considers the bulk of the population not on his plane of thought. I’m not judging the outliers, I am merely pointing out his own hypocrisy about who he sees as outliers.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 09:49

        “I would consider him an outlier because of belief system. Following his philosophy, we shouldnt pay attention to the outliers.”

        And what about the outlier who only pays attention to the fat part of the bell curve?

        Probably why ABD and I seem to have some affinity towards one-another. Being an outlier is a far more multi-faceted than being an indoctrinated regurgitator who believes the 2,000 year-old tired bromides they vomit up are original thought and “logical.” Outliers are all over the map and being one is no guarantee that you’ll find others with enough common interests to gel.

        It’s more like real life.

        That’s why it’s our mission to help the “normal” become outliers.

        make sense? Good. Onward.

      • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 17:34

        Exactly. I tried to be a political outlier for 8 years, what a waste of time. I changed a LOT of opinions, and now I feel rotten that I wasted that time. Now, I prefer to share what I’ve done to make my life wonderful, and I love seeing both men and women just give it a try for 90 days and come back and thank me profusely a year later for recommending those changes.

        Still, it’s a losing battle and I know it — for every 1 guy or 1 couple I give some links to, another 20 are born and swallow the normal pill and end up shoveling the shit of guys like me for the rest of their lives.

        I welcome competition in my “markets”, and if there is no competition to be had, I’ll finance it out of pocket. Challenge is what drives me, even if that challenge will put me “out of business.”

      • Gabriella Kadar on February 11, 2013 at 18:20

        Richard, except for some serious mangling of Magyar (he’s doing his best), I love this Ted lecture. Saw it in 2007 and kept it in my favourites every since.

    • Gabriella Kadar on February 11, 2013 at 18:29

      Wooo, are you saying it’s hopeless? I mean for everyone?

    • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 18:40

      It was my understanding that “intensity” was the gene and environment was the influencer of the target. So, an asshole/zealot christian would be an asshole atheist.

      I do not remember the sources cited specifically. I found them in the book Nature via Nurture.

      Now, it looks like I will be on ANOTHER rabbit hole dive.

      • Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 18:43


        After reading again, it looks like I am saying the same thing. Extremes are genetically hardwired. One may switch their view but it will be extreme to the other side. No middle.

        Unless you do some mushrooms, of course.

  10. Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 15:50

    Clearly ignorance is not bliss.

    Funny that Richard has been all over the world and he’s gone and married a “Latina”. Seems they are doing very well and her ‘thirdy worldy’nessd hasn’t contaminated Euro-whitey Richard. Or has it?

    • Mary on February 10, 2013 at 16:34

      They don’t have kids, right? So his line ends. This may be why he doesn’t seem to care much for those who will have to deal with the ‘multicult’ hell on earth we are leaving for future Whites to deal with.

      • Gabriella Kadar on February 10, 2013 at 17:26

        I have kids, Mary. There’s plenty of things I see that I don’t like.

        There’s a lot of awfulness going on in the world. People come to Canada because they want to live in peace and raise their children to have a better life than the one they left behind. Really by comparison to what goes on in Egypt, Syria or Iran etc., nothing happens here.

        We have Montrealers whacking pots and pans with spoons to protest tuition increases at universities. We have ‘Idle No More’ blocking a bridge or a rail line. It’s not like Kent State that’s for sure. The army isn’t coming out and mowing people down.

        (Mind you the G8 pseudo riot that happened here in Toronto was scandalous. My daughter was manager at the downtown YMCA that day and they were in lockdown. My other daughter was there with her at the time. So shit did happen but it had nothing to do with multicult. It was due to the decision of a whitey prime minister and an extraordinarily stupid whitey police chief.) In fact, probably the most intelligent mayor of a big city in Canada is a brown muslim. Montreal and Edmonton have Jewish mayors and both are excellent. Don’t ask me about our mayor…. but he’s as white as they get without being albino.

        The absolutely worst neighbours I have ever had were white, Canadian drug cooking after hours club Rottweiler owning criminals. They’d have people coming and going from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. Fridays and Saturdays.

        After I called the cops for the second time they poisoned my cats. 10 days later they moved.

        In this country ‘white collar crime’ where people with access to public funds abuse this privilege….oh, shucks, they seem to be almost exclusively white. Whitey lawyers who write the legislation have conveniently not included anything about making these crooks pay the money back. It must be those much vaunted European mores at play. Just like the big scandal over in England (white) where horsemeat was imported to meat processors in Ireland (white) from Poland (more white) and Romania (white) and sold as beef. And no ones checked the DNA since 2003!!

        So what’s the deal with all that then?

        You may have no option but to get over it and get along because even the Republicans have seen the writing on the wall. With all the Hispanics in the US, they’ll never get a president in the White House unless they hold their noses and vote for changes on immigration (legal and illegal) policy. Good luck.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 08:32

        “They don’t have kids, right? So his line ends.”

        “His [_line_] ends.” Are you even for reals, or a character come to life out of some medieval novel?

        Nope. No kids. Plenty of nephews & nieces, though.

        …And then there’s that little pesky little blog thingy. 3,500 posts and counting, and Google treats me very, very well. I suppose I could devote the entirety of my little socio-political project to a couple of little muffins I’d surely adore —we could even adopt if we wanted. Or, I could continue to devote my time to thousands of already developed minds and steer a few, here and there—who in turn steer a few, etc.

        It really all comes down to the way in which a person chooses to become immortal. How many kids—little racist xenophobes—are you working on, Mary? Taking stock of your social activities as well, care to speculate as to who’s going to influence more intelligent minds between you and I?

        I tend to look at these things differently than most. Knock yourself out, Mary. Indoctrinate as many as you can. But you might want to make sure they don’t read my blog. This is competition of ideas, in the end, and I have zero doubt mine will outcompete yours in terms of assimilation to action.

        Racism and xenophobia are essentially dead. Stuff like this is merely an exercise in giving wide swath for the racists and xenophobes to comment, such that people can see why.

        So I suppose I owe you, Elenor, Earl and others a bit of thanks for being actors on my little stage.

      • Mary on February 11, 2013 at 09:30

        Nope. No kids.

        As I said: your line ends. It means you have little real investment in how future Whites will have to live, and adds context to your “we are all Brown” comments.
        You are not Brown, Richard . You owe what your are to your ancestors who did not race-mix.
        Some ‘thank you’ you gave them……

        Ps: Hilarious that you cite the existence of your blog as having some sort of relevance to this point, lol. I think someone’s ego is a little out of whack…..;)

        And You are most welcome for my sparing a few minutes to read and comment on your occasional anti-White screeds, highly entertaining stuff.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 11:20

        “your line ends. It means you have little real investment in how future Whites will have to live, and adds context to your “we are all Brown” comments.”

        You are quite a piece of racist work, Mary. The way you capitalize white and brown is pretty telling of your…what? deep murderous envy. Besides, you’re dishonest too because I said “In the end,” which is just true….unless….

        Let me ask you. How about we just start exterminating all non whites? Would that satisfy you? Make you comfortable? Assuage your fears?

        In the end, you are afraid of non-white people, which you demonstrate. You are a coward, in fear. I have zero fear, and having lived in Asia and travelled to every 3rd world shithole there you can imagine, and walked through open sewers…

        …I just have a different perspective than you. But I’m not going to toss pearls before swine either, because you are, in my view, not worth it but for the record you’re writing for me here.

        You may be white, but I can think of a hundred blacks, browns and yellows off the top of my head I’d rather spend time with, and have teach my nephews & nieces.

        “Hilarious that you cite the existence of your blog as having some sort of relevance to this point, lol. I think someone’s ego is a little out of whack…..;)”

        That’s what you think. Archives go back to 2003, and get 35,000 unique visits per week. This website is in the top 100,000 websites in the world based on links and traffic. In other words, I have more influence over random minds in one week than you will have in a lifetime, no matter how many pure white indoctrinated minds you can manage to shit out or otherwise indoctrinate in yours; at least so far, but commenting on blogs isn’t going to accomplish shit, and commenting on this one is guaranteed counter-productive to your aims.

        Again, thanks for adding to the eye rolling insanity. I truly do appreciate it, because it’s gold. I could blog all day and every day about how there really are white people who still actually live in fear and ignorance over the jew menace, white menace, brown menace, alien menace, but in point of actual fact, a single comment from you, Earl, Elenor on this subject is more valuable than 10 posts I could possible write. It is really good for people to see how a proud white race that does actually have laudable props (the original sin of colonialism and slavery marginally notwithstanding) can become so cowering and afraid.

        You ought to change your email to white1afraid@.

        Stay tuned for an upcoming blog post that features you, Earl, Elenor. Yep, I’m making you famous. Feel free to add some shit in comments and I’ll take it under advisement.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 18:13

        Unlike you, I don’t care much for that thing that keeps you warm at night, you know, the thing you cling to as if it were gold, the elusive “internet fame” 😉 But if making posts denouncing “evil” pro-White people makes you feel all full inside, you go for it, dear.

        And your hysterical shrieks re: “Why don’t we exterminate Blacks, etc” is just more silliness from a man who looks more fragile by the minute. Nowhere did I say anything of the sort, but this is the kind of idiocy you resort to time and time again. You banned Porter after his posting only two comments to you on this very subject because you know he had you cornered, lol….and you call me a “coward”? Funny stuff!

        It’s quite simple. You are an anti-White agitator Richard.
        And you do this because A: you have no children and therefore have no real ‘dog in the race’ for how future Whites will have to live.
        B: Because you like being ‘popular’ (despite your constant reminding all what a tough ‘rebel’ you are (lol). The real truth is that the true heroes of our time are people who speak up for what is good for Whites . Your own country-woman, German heroine Sylvia Stolz, has just been released from prison after 3.5 years for that! If you had even one of the big balls you imagine you have, you’d save your breath attacking anonymous internet posters like myself, Eleanor and Earl, and write a compelling piece on Sylvia, allowing the masses you claim to have such influence over hear some gut-level truth-to-power spoken loud and proud by a powerful being such as she. But I won’t be holding my breath for that one 😉

        Asia for Asians
        Africa for Africans
        But why are White Countries for Everybody?


      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 18:29

        Bla bla bla.

        Just go away, stay away, white one. Please.

        Porter was an idiot.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 18:39

        Compelling response! Bravo!

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 19:40

        Just STFU, Mary. Please. Enough with the racism.

      • Joshua on February 13, 2013 at 06:31

        Why do morons not understand that calling somebody “dear” in a response instantly devalues anything that follows? It’s a completely transparent attempt to elevate your status above another, and it only works on other morons.

      • Mary on February 13, 2013 at 08:10

        I left my last word to you in a comment up-thread. As I said from the start, (and by ‘start’, I mean the ‘Jimmy Moore’ episode where this really began) I, like many others I am sure, valued your blog for the fantastic writing on your return to health and nutrition/fitness related matters, paleo, etc.
        I said I held you in high regard in that vein, and I continue to. But as far as discussing race, it’s clear you are simply not going to allow the same ‘freedom’ you seem to cherish in other matters be applied here; and I don’t blame you. There is little benefit in it really, unless you are willing to endure a lot of hassle, and be well assured I don’t mean from me 😉

        So I wish you health, wealth and happiness. And when the day comes (and I bet it will) where you come to see I wasn’t your “enemy” at all, perhaps you will wish the same for me.

        Good luck.

      • A.B. Dada on February 11, 2013 at 18:34

        Sometimes I wonder if maybe the white-colored races had some genetic predisposition to birthing sons (or if they engaged in daughter filicide), which left a massive overpopulation of men.

        If this is the case, the common solution was to go to war to wither the male population down.

        If one color happens to have excessive males and is more war mongering than a race color with more balanced gender ratios, it is likely that the excessively war mongering race will “win” based on attrition.

        War has always been a predictor of growth in technology and technological superiority, too.

  11. Bill on February 10, 2013 at 16:12

    Just read this

    and this:
    The MSM have not covered this. It should be headline news.
    Most people will be ignorance of this horrific attack on freedom of speech. It’s so depressing.

  12. Jscott on February 11, 2013 at 15:14


    Every polarizing issue has people on BOTH sides who exploit those who are ACTUALLY caught up in it.

    And that is the big IT with beliefs. Do not get too attached. Be able to entertain any side. Laugh at all of it because life is not so serious…

    It however is a ride. Just a ride.

  13. Mick Lately on February 11, 2013 at 05:13

    “Plus a link to a relationship between porn viewing and bi-sexuality that I can’t locate at the moment.”

    If you find this link can you post it/e-mail it to me?

    I want to see if it matches with my own independently-developed theories.

  14. Matt on February 11, 2013 at 09:28

    Richard – this video was sent to me yesterday, and I think it somewhat relates to this subject. Those who make their living from calling other people racists/sexists/bigots deserve what they get, particularly when they are completely full of shit:

    Finger-pointing can be useful on occasion to bring about awareness and discussion, but as always, it can go too far.

    Our society spends too much time putting people into groups – classifying them… poor, middle class, white, black, gay, the 1%, the 2%, the 99%, republican, democrat, smart, dumb, 1st grade, college-educated, jobless, homeless, disabled, privileged…etc.

    This collectivist horseshit is DESIGNED to keep us fighting with each other, while the government nullifies more of our individual rights/liberties (and takes more of our money) in the name of “fairness” and “leveling the playing field.”

    I enjoy your blog – keep up the good work.

    • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 10:54

      Sorry Matt, but the video just brings up a page with many videos. A clue, in YouTube, always now click on the “share” link to get the permalink or the embed code. Copy/pasting from your browser address doesn’t work consistently, anymore.

      • Matt on February 11, 2013 at 11:24

        Thanks for the heads-up:

        “David Starkey vs. Laurie Penny – full video”

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 12:49

        Thanks Matt. Funny, since the dead link, I’d forgotten completely about which way you might be turning on this.

        I had to come back to the thread to find that indeed, you saw it exactly as I did.

        No, I have no more use for the professional purveyors of white guilt than I do the white racists and xenophobes. It’s a circus and the the only real entertainment value is in deciding which is more full of shit.

      • Matt on February 11, 2013 at 13:13


        Every polarizing issue has people on BOTH sides who exploit those who are ACTUALLY caught up in it.
        It’s usually a good idea just to expose yourself to different points of view, to gain perspective.

        Myself, as a white male, I don’t believe I could truly understand racial prejudice, or sexual prejudice, for that matter. I am willing to listen to other opinions, in order to increase my understanding.

        Louis C.K. illustrates my point really well, with humor:

        I feel comedy can be a great way to get a point across.

        On the other hand, if I want a much more serious example of how “good” I (and we) already have it, maybe I’ll watch something like “The Cannibal Warlords of Liberia” (on Youtube) to gain some fresh perspective.

      • Richard Nikoley on February 11, 2013 at 18:12

        You’re right, Matt. Humor can be very effective. That video is hilarious.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 18:22

        C.K.’s paternal grandfather, a Jewish Hungarian, had emigrated to Mexico, where he met C.K.’s paternal grandmother, who was a Catholic Mexican of Spanish and Mexican Indian ancestry.

        Yeah, that’s some “White” man ya got there…………lolzzzzzzzz

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 18:30

        Shut the fuck up, Mary. Just shut the fuck up.

      • Mary on February 12, 2013 at 19:29

        Devastating reply, Richard. You really have outdone yourself with this one 😉

      • Richard Nikoley on February 12, 2013 at 21:51

        It’s as much as you deserve.

      • Matt on February 13, 2013 at 11:23

        Ah, Mary… thanks for clearing that up.

        Now, when that (whiter-than-snow) Ginger walks down the street, no one will be confused, because you’ll be following behind him with a printout from, shouting “Don’t listen to him – he has Jew-blood!”

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow by Email8k