One fucktarded, regurgitated story, here.
“Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent,” the law states, “nor does silence mean consent. Affirmative consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can be revoked at any time.”
So, is “yes, Yes, YES, YeSSSSS safe haven?
…Close to the most anti-animal, ridiculous fodder for jilted cuntfmales and adventuresome prosecutors I’ve ever heard of. Because it’s basal, and putting legal distinctions on intimate human animal behavior is something only The Land of The Free would dare to do.
No worries. Someone else will care for the kids who get chewed up up in this femiNAZI cunt adventure. It’s so…motherly.
…I haven’t read the legislation but what I’m primarily interested in is how a judge’s decision tuns on the distinction between a raging hard cock and a swollen, dripping wet pussy. Just guessing, but I’d guess that few black robe types, perched on benches have ever experienced a swollen, dripping wet pussy.
May you live in fucktarded times.