Here’s what I can guarantee. I fuck with both the right and the left. If you have a Facebook account, just click here and follow it. You can even comment.
A Sample, over the last few days:
Exactly, with the stipulation that few know what an anarchist is (part of the problem). It’s the opposite of the nihilism and communism so often erroneously associated with it.
“The real reason for government licensure is to artificially restrict entry into occupations to increase the wages of current practitioners. In the 1950s, one out of 20 U.S. workers were required to obtain a government license. Today that number is nearly one out of every three workers.” —Lawrence McQuillan
Yes, labor unions, licensing and even trade associations with their lobbying on behalf of established members are all fundamentally for one thing: make it difficult for potential entrants into the market, thereby artificially raising wages and profits to those so privileged, via State force and coercion.
In other words, they use the dynamics of markets (curtail supply and prices rise) in order to defeat FREE markets. They can’t compete with free markets at the wages and prices they wish, so they use the force of state to make it artificial.
One must entertain the possibility that the priesthood and nunnery were the ancient Catholic Institution’s way of dealing with homosexuals.
The State will shut them dow soon enough. Don’t worry.
One of the very most essential things to understand about a state of force is that is cannot tolerate anything that might make you imagine being able to live without them.
This is one reason all the biggest corporations are statutory entities under a fashion of charter, and the tradeoff is a level of oversight for protection from personal liability. If you go to being publicly traded, the oversight intensifies, but so do the protections.
This is horrible. Medicines Sans Frontiers is a fantastic GOOD-WILL organization. I have never detected a political bone or side-taking in their operations ever and critique that if you like, but what’s you point?
Theirs is to give aid to who-ever all the fucks fuck up, whether they have fucking-up reasons, or not.
So, caulk up another omelet to the the eternal belief that America is the geopolitical guiding light of the world.
If they are, when do they serve breakfast without omelets?
Who didn’t get the memo that nobody cares about Australia for its social or public policy experiments?
It’s all in how you look at it. Or, evade it.
Tell me again how Bushy is a murderer, but Obama is your Comrade.
Stupid fucks. Stupid, stupid fucks. And, all those stupid fucks will excuse Obama. They have to.
I absolutely do think this is a great idea, David Wolf.
The thing is, via the wealth of capitalist accumulation, winners and losers, suckers and pawns, and get alongs, people manage to find a niche where they can take values and receive a medium of exchange.
They can better their circumstances. Some do it in months. Others, it’s years, and for others, it requires some rebound from something very bad. Some get by over a lifetime and instill frugal values.
It takes a planet.
But yea, everyone with a few bucks, chip in. Why not?
Or, were you talking about making it easy, just use guns to steal it from people to build bridges?
The propensity of presumably intelligent FUCKING ADULTS to say: well, this was fucked up, so lets just be fucked up again, is astounding.
No wonder virtually nobody is competent to raise a child, anymore.
…My mom told me that two wrongs don’t make a right and eventually, I understood she was talking principle speak, to me.
Fuck fuck fuck fuck STUPID FUCKS who are destroying mindfulness and a basic ability to even fucking think.
The destruction of the human gut microbiome update.
“They found a very surprising correlation: A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.”
This is false to fact and anyone not ignorant in these matters understands that instantly.
Bill Whittle calmly and in a soft voice annihilates every lefty emotional and statistically irrelevant and cherry picked argument for gun control that exists.
Most lefties can maybe be excused on the basis of ignorance (though I won’t) but it’s the job of policy makers to have a complete grasp of all the data and honestly make best efforts to draft policy according to ALL the relevant facts of reality and then cogently communicate the facts and principles underlying said legislation.
~ Pop Quiz.
How many ignorant, petition signing lefties do you think are aware that the NRA supported the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, and the Gun Control Act of 1968?
Most ironic is that the A in NRA stands for Association. So, in terms of moral principle, they are stating by signature that they want some free associations to be banned (“stop” being an euphemism). And guess what tools are ultimately used to enforce such bans?
Second part of the quiz: does anyone know a political leftie who has a damn clue ever of the principle moral implications (such as just illustrated above) of the stupid shit they advocate?
“She said if women refrain from speaking up for themselves, they aren’t treated equally.”
Just shut the fuck up.
~ The cunts are a problem, but it’s hard to imagine than feminism can engender mass murder when it’s not particularly associated with slavery, conscription, institutionalized butt rape and nuns running schools.
This is, once again, an excellent recounting of the undermining of the bedrock of civilization: men and masculinity.
As such, it stands on its own and ought to be integrated, mass murder incidents or not. It does not come close to causality.
You need to get to why young men are going crazy in large numbers, acted out in small numbers by a few.
I propose an alternate hypothesis.
~ Uber Mensch.
“The Las Vegas taxi industry used every political maneuver in its arsenal to keep Uber and Lyft off the strip. It didn’t work.”
Thank goG for small favors. It astounds me that this kind of obvious protectionism isn’t just met with summary dismissal, as in “oh just sit down and shut the fuck up.”
You know, there was days and I still manage to remember them, where the very first thing a father and mother would do in the face of something horrible like this would be self-examination.
“Where did we go wrong?”
The left loathes that sort of valid introspection because it doesn’t require the State. Anybody can do it, and everyone ought to.
Fuck moron fucktard leftie-commies who egg on this sort of misguided “analysis” to make it your fault. Fuck them all.
That’s an implication of pragmatism over principles, just in case you’re philosophically illiterate.
Just look at all those pussy-boys lined up, as cogs, bits and bytes in the machine and its software.
Principally, it’s not any different than German soldiers loading families of Jews into boxcars.
“The collapse of the Rand Paul campaign speaks volumes. In a 15-person field, Paul is the only candidate who looks even remotely libertarian (social tolerance, foreign policy restraint, and limited government). He started the campaign with decent name recognition, a seat in the United States Senate, lavish media attention, a serious will to win, and a battle-tested, national political operation inherited from his father, Ron.
“If there were any significant support for Libertarian ideas in the GOP—any at all—Rand Paul would be near the top of an otherwise crowded, fragmented field that is fighting over every non-libertarian voter in the party.”
You know, I thought it was wrongheaded for Ron to be a Republican. Same for Rand. …It’s probably that doG loving shit.
Both would be far, far better being Democrats, given their insistence of “play the game as it is, or go home.” It is a two party system and America is so far from an ability to think beyond binary it’s ridiculous, but them’s the rulz.
I think Rand might be able to light up some Democrats, maybe make a way bigger impact.
The Republican party is so fraught with fucking crazies (the ones Trump knows how to speak to) who are so cocksure, and they have nothing less than the authority of doG behind them.
Democrats are an ocean of mush for brains, so perhaps there’s some molding that could take place.
Just an idea.
…I added a lot more later:
Let’s think. It’s three paragraphs, but what if we juxtapose the fist two with the last?
“The most thorough search for libertarian sentiment was conducted last year by the Pew Research Center. They asked 10,013 adults 23 questions about a variety of social and political issues and then used cluster analysis to sort respondents into homogeneous groups. Pew found that Americans who “resembled libertarians” form a group that is “too small to analyze”: no more than 5 percent of those surveyed.
“It’s true that if we avoid asking people about concrete issues and instead ask general questions, we can (if we squint hard enough) see a great deal of latent libertarian sentiment out there.”
I’m going to call that the Reason (TM) effect.
That’s a rather inside joke…those of us who tolerate Reason (TM), but understand they’re really just a bunch of pragmatists and consequentialists (i.e., ‘well, just make sure your theft is better than their theft’).
But after all, Reason has been pretty successful in getting messages out, but they’re non-partisan, which is either good or bad, depending on how you look at it; but what it’s particularly bad for is partisans, which defines the whole antagonism.
So now, let’s compare.
“It has been noted, for instance, that 59 percent of the American public is, broadly speaking, libertarian in that they answer “yes” to the question “Would you define yourself as fiscally conservative and socially liberal?” Political scientists and campaign strategists, however, almost universally dismiss self-identification and general sentiment surveys as functionally meaningless. Both academic investigation and hard-earned political experience tell us that attitudes about specific governmental programs are far more telling than asking people what labels or characterizations describe them best.”
Do you get it?
Let me help. Libertarianism is a counter (political) philosophy, not a political PARTY, which is basically a contraction in terms.
It can be rationally argued that it’s good the Libertarian Party never succeeded. But it’s just as valid to celebrate the failure of Ron Paul, and even the worse failure of his son Rand, because by being libertarian and deciding to engage the partisan antagonism as Republicans, they diluted their message and exposed their lack of principles in one fell swoop.
At least there remain some elements in America where you don’t get to have your cake and eat it too.
So, the libertarian message appears to be getting out there and who knows but that a Ron & Rand failure after failure contributes to that.
I take heart that the essential message is non-partisan in the polling—the ideas are everywhere, which is what is should be. You get to decide for yourselves whether than means ‘political parties are an ass,’ in the close-words of Mr. Bumble.
…A final thought is that neither Ron or Rand had any clue of what aligning with or even courting the religious right entails and costs. It ought to bankrupt you, and hopefully more politicians come to realize that and then we can focus on courting commies.
I lived as a fundamentalist Baptist, “born-again,” from the age of 10 to 19. I know them, and there are people still in my dad’s side of the family that, 35 years later, are still “intellectually” unchanged, living in increasing cognitive dissonance, still waiting and seeing signs everywhere that Jesus is Coming Soon. The most fucktarded people I know first hand, really.
It’s pathetic of course, But it goes to show that anyone of libertarian leaning, engaged in the political process, ought, as first act, tell the religious right to go fuck themselves.
Trust me on this. I have taken a daily shit on that stuff for 25 years, now, and all my family know it. I do not ever mince words, and those people know I have zero respect for their “minds.” I don’t and they should know who they are.
Short: Ron and Rand never got anywhere, because they’re either religious fucktards themselves, or they’re frauds who thought those intransigent, sky looking religious right imbeciles would help them rather that destroy them.
I’m glad that alignment destroyed them.
“A German woman is protesting the eviction notice she received informing her she has until the end of the year to vacate the government-owned apartment she rents in order to make room for migrants who have arrived seeking asylum.”
Delicious. Just delicious.
I think my mom taught me that “beggars can’t be choosers,” back when moms instilled important moral lessons to little sons. Made sense then, and I’m glad to see it wield justice now.
~ Sorry gals. you’re just not that smart. At least when it comes to the science and engineering of building and maintaining a civilization so you can sit your asses down to get fat and complain. On the other hand, the smartest among you understand all that, and you know exactly what motivating influences are behind it, and every guy who’s ever lived can’t thank you enough.
Interesting. Out of a sample of 100 million (50 million men and 50 million women) taking a 36-question IQ test at http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com, by the time you get to 140 and above, there are 2.5 men at that level to 1 women, and the gap only widens the father up you go.
The top woman score was 176, for one women out of 50 million. 18 out of 50 million men scored that high or higher, and of those 18, 13 men scored higher than any woman.
So, if in 100 million there are 13 men smarter than any woman, then extrapolating to earth’s 7.3 billion population, that means there are at least 949 men smarter than any woman on earth.
I have zero doubt about that, and it’s probably way more.
After reading the MILO YIANNOPOULOS post, SORRY, GIRLS! BUT THE SMARTEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD ARE ALL MEN, I decided I had to take the test myself:
Well, that’s a pretty fucking tough test. It’s all patterns, and in some cases you’re dealing with 3-4 different patterns, near as I could tell.
1/3 was pretty easy, 1/3 hard, but I knew I had the correct answer and another 3rd was basically eliminating as many of the 7 answers as possible and then picking the one that seemed most likely. Clearly I don’t do well guessing.
But, I’ll take a 132 IQ with a 15 point standard deviation. Years ago I did 146 on a Mensa test, so within the standard dev.
Do take it. 36 questions and about 25 are pretty fucking brutal. Costs $9 for the results, but that’s to help ensure some measure of validity to the data they’re gathering.
“Teenager – without requesting permission – starts answering customer support tweets for a video sharing app – actually doing a better job than their customer support. The company asked him to shut down his unofficial support service … then decided to hire him instead.”
You always hear leftist blather about “creating jobs,” or “giving a job.” How about just take a fucking job? Make yourself a job, give it to yourself.
America the lame.
Lets finish off:
- While Obama Talks Gun Control – 50+ People Killed, 50+ Injured in China Knife Attack
- Kansas regents prepare to open universities to guns under new law (Perhaps it should be called the anti-sitting duck law)
- The Staggering Cost of Cleaning Up the Mess When the Wind Power Fiasco Ends (This is fucking hilarious. Fucktard leftie commie economic illiterates, again. I’ve proven for myself, by actually doing it, that at the current technology, one can do quite decent on solar and batteries–provided one isn’t too far north or south hemisphere, of course. And, it’s improving. But save for a very few locals, wind is just dumb and ugly.)
There’s more, but you’ll just need to tune in if you like the mind-fuck nature of it. I think this is pretty heavily weighed against the morons on the left, but eventually, I’ll turn my sights on the religious fanatic fascists on the right.
Everyone is fair game, and I believe I’ve given you evidence to demonstrate that I’m probably adept enough to take on anyone. Go take the test yourself, see how you do. Post your results in comments. One guy in my Facebook clocked in at 152, 20 points better than I, and I’m happy to have him slumming where I roam.
What did I say a long time ago? I Collect Smart People.