Unequivocal Proof Of Facebook Bias In Temporary Blocking

I have quite a record of my richard.nikoley Facebook Profile being temporarily blocked. This latest one is NUMBER ELEVEN. Here’s a bit of a history and the bogus “reason” behind the last one, #10.

In my 10 preceding temporary blocks, it has always been over something I had written in an original post, or something I had written in a comment somewhere. None were ever over sharing anything anyone else had posted, or sharing a link to anything on the Internet at large. In this case, above, clicking on my name simply takes me to my own profile, lending the impression that my name and profile/profile pic itself “…offers [] sexual services, solicitation of sexual material, threats or depictions of sexual violence, threats to share intimate images or any sexual content involving minors.” What Zucktard writes this stupid shit? Overbroad, much? It ranges from sexual innuendo banter (which you see all the time) to felony child abuse for fuck’s sake. Moron SJWs…that entire “community standards” department.

So, what was it this time? Since they didn’t show me the photo, I had no clue, and that OPEN button does nothing. I post orignals and share so many posts of others on FB that that’s it’s hard to know what you’re looking for that’s no longer there. Fortunately, a friend suggested a possibility via text, and sure enough, it was the one. It was a share (not an original posting) last Saturday via the one who posted it originally and one of my FB friends who had shared it. So, the share line:

Original Poster —> My Facebook Friend Shares —> I Re-Share

Here it is, and don’t laugh because feelings and sensitivities are at stake.

[social_warfare buttons=”Facebook,Twitter”]

Unequivocal Facebook Bias #1

So, nudity, a thong, or maybe a bikini? Who can tell? She appears to be an adult, so at least felony child pornography is off the table, I guess. Moreover, how do you draw a line between that photo and, say, this Facebook Page, Keith Selle Photography, chock full of female buttocks? Pictures of female buttocks are not hard to find on Facebook, just search ‘pictures of butts’. So, there’s your first unequivocal judgment and conviction of Facebook’s unscrupulous bias in the service of snowflakes, tender flowers, fat-bottomed girls, feminists, and SJWs everywhere. Guilty.

Unequivocal Facebook Bias #2

Or, what if it’s just someone whose primary motivation is to target me?

I shared that last Saturday. By last evening, Tuesday, it had accumulated over 25 reactions (likes, loves, and LOLs). Then comes along a single pissant individual who takes a piss in the pool and get’s treated by Zucktards like he or she is the pool guy from heaven…the veritable savior of sound pool chemistry everywhere. Guilty.

Unequivocal Facebook Bias #3

This is the three strikes you’re out and the most egregious and duplicitous by far.

The photo is still up at Facebook for anyone to see. In both places—the originator and the one I shared it from—and both are public posts, so not just for their FB friends. But it gets even far more damning. It has been shared from the originator’s post 173 times.

I clicked on that 173 Shares link and it shows me everyone who has shared it. And, they’re all public shares (parent to child permissions) and you can scroll down and click “Show Attachment” on each and every one and yep, there it is. Here’s proof it’s still up from the originator and my Facebook friend who shared it, clipped just a few hours ago.

So, given my share, those two above, plus the 173 shares, we have an instance where, amongst 176 posters of that photo, I am the sole one being singled out, and all because some humanoid waste of flesh targets my posts for reporting and Facebook treats them like a hero for enforcing community standard. Seems to me that the only equitable way to do this would be either 1) locate the originator and deal with it there, or, 2) find all instances of the image and deal with everyone. But Facebook seems, rather, to prefer having their little army of one-off enforcers who believe they’re doing something special and important when clearly, they’re not.


Does any fair minded individual in the world need more proof that Facebook is a wholly evil company—who will share your private data to the highest bidder (as long as the bidder is leftist and Democrat)—and that Mark Zuckerberg is even more evil, to his very manipulative core—with all of his transparently faux posturing and “we care” bullshit?”

As a final note, if you’re reading this and have posted or shared that image, please leave it up. First time “offenders” get a freebie anyway. This was my 11th, so it cost me another 30-day sentence (as it has from about the 5th “offense”).

I wish to preserve the record of what I have exposed. I’ll be crossposting this to my Medium Profile and then I’ll be seeking to distribute it to news outlets to see if I can get any traction. Given Facebook’s waning popularity of late for private-data mining to Democrat political campaigns, a dogpile would be an excellent thing and couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of Zucktards. I have withheld links and identifying information about anyone else and will only pass them along to legitimate news outlets, but only so they can do due diligence.

And you can help too. Please share the ever lovin’ shit out of this on any or all social media you can. I almost never ask for this sort of thing. Now, I’m admonishing: Please Share It. It’s not for my benefit as much as it is the far more important element of exposing Fauxbook for exactly with it is in terms of wanton duplicity and bias.

Should any news or podcast publisher wish to interview me by phone or Skype, I’m unequivocally available. Drop a comment here, anywhere on Facebook, or via Facebook Messenger (I can’t reply to anything on Facebook, but I see all comments and messages). Leave a way to contact you.


Richard Nikoley

I'm Richard Nikoley. Free The Animal began in 2003 and as of 2021, contains 5,000 posts. I blog what I wish...from health, diet, and food to travel and lifestyle; to politics, social antagonism, expat-living location and time independent—while you sleep—income. I celebrate the audacity and hubris to live by your own exclusive authority and take your own chances. Read More


  1. John Dyki on April 4, 2018 at 12:55

    Facebook sucks! This is exactly what you said, Richard – a fucktard has you in their radar. And yes it was my share that you reshared. I’m ready to dump Facebook, leftist morons that they are.

    • Richard Nikoley on April 4, 2018 at 13:10

      Yep, I know it was yours, and who you shared it from. But I’m not a dick in that regard, so didn’t out (nor the other 172 folks who shared it).

      By the way, thanks a fuckin’ lot, John. 🙂

    • John Dyki on April 4, 2018 at 15:34

      Let’s try for a Baker’s Dozen??? 🙂

    • Joseph Ingraham on December 25, 2020 at 10:10

      I just got 3 day because called a biden supporter stupid because they were telling that Trump was still guilty of all the russia garbage! I have been call names and been cussed. More times then I can count and they did nothing to them! If you are pro biden (Socialist) you can say or call anyone who supports Trump anything you want! But any excuse works if you support Trump!

  2. Tim Steele on April 4, 2018 at 20:37

    Haha, I got my first FB slap for posting this, it came with a “decency” warning:

    • Tim Steele on April 4, 2018 at 20:39

      Then, a few minutes later, they had gone through my entire library of pictures and found another indecent photo that they wanted me to delete. I guess they think I’m into bestialty:

    • Richard Nikoley on April 4, 2018 at 20:44


      Nice post. Nice ass.

    • Richard Nikoley on April 4, 2018 at 20:46

      That’s some real edible ass right there.

      Rump roast.

      This will break bad. I keep telling people. Now we have a YouTube shooting.

      There is a lot more to follow and Zuck is a little boy.

    • John Dyki on April 4, 2018 at 21:07

      That’s a fine setpoint ya got there Tim.

    • fearless on April 4, 2018 at 22:34

      Gee. I am glad I don’t work at Facebook, YouTube, Google etc. It appears that their assumption they can act with complete impunity is being challenged – by gun toting female vegans no less.

    • Alec on April 14, 2018 at 06:37

      That’s a great bottom, Tim. Thanks for posting. I liked Richard’s picture of Pont Neuf as well.

      As Richard said below, “That’s some real yummy ass right there.”

  3. La Frite on April 5, 2018 at 01:27

    Hehehe, very nice Parisian b…ridge 😀

    PS: in French phonetic, FB is usually pronounced “fesse-bouc”, aka butt-billy-goat 😀 Can’t help but smile at the whole circus-drama.

    • Richard Nikoley on April 5, 2018 at 12:54

      I always thought it a bit funny that French for butt sounds pretty close to face in English. In fact, in a French accent pronouncing face, pretty much fesse. 🙂

    • La Frite on April 5, 2018 at 22:54

      You can kiss my fesse Richard 😀

  4. Adam Rezner on April 5, 2018 at 18:50

    This has pushed me to deactivate (and perhaps delete) my FB account. So sick of their shit and everything the company stands for.

    • Richard Nikoley on April 5, 2018 at 19:31

      Wait until you see the update.

      It gets worse.

  5. Will on April 7, 2018 at 13:46

    Kim Kardashian frequently shows the same amount of ass, and is considered to be a strong, independent, empowered “progressive” woman. While you post a link showing a little ha ha ha, and they say “hit the ramp, tramp!” What the fuck ever! I am watching videos on Bitchute these days, and have started to explore Minds, Gab, and other social media that is not run by fanatical puritans.

  6. Louise on April 8, 2018 at 18:31

    Yay! You’re waking up Richard!

  7. hap on April 13, 2018 at 13:05

    Zuck has hired 20K new “content managers”. Claims their Liberal bias will be no issue. Besides, all hate speech will be dealt with by AI…according to Zuck congressional testimony. Although he could not define hate speech, AI will take care of it.

  8. Louise on April 14, 2018 at 07:32

    Get ready for much more.

    “Sen. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) is the author of the “Online False Information Act,” a new bill that would require anyone who posts any news on the Internet to verify all information through “fact-checkers.” Sen. Pan does not name who these “fact checkers” are, but I’m sure the State of California will create a new agency of state workers to oversee this.

    The bill will “require any person who operates a social media, as defined, Internet Web site with a physical presence in California to develop a strategic plan to verify news stories shared on its Web site. The goal of Senate Bill 1424 is “to mitigate the spread of false information through news stories,..”

    Same guy that brought you the vaccine mandates. You’re OK with that though.

    Cali is screwed.

    • Alec on April 14, 2018 at 12:36

      Wow, Louise. The Ministry of Truth. For real. Orwell warned us as did Woodrow Wilson in The New Freedom in 1913:

      A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men … [W]e have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.

      And he warned us about hidden powers:

      Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

      A conspiracy theory which pre-dates the CIA’s creation of the “conspiracy theory” meme and which includes a sitting president of the United States.

    • Louise on April 15, 2018 at 07:44

      Which could ultimately bring north America to this (California seems to be the testing ground, as it is/was for vaccine mandates (the removal of personal sovereignty) , open borders etc.):

      “All your online behaviour would be analysed and assessed to come up with a measure of your online reputation, character and trustworthiness.

      This could then be used by employers to decide whether to offer you a job, by banks to decide whether to give you a loan, or even by prospective partners.

      Well, China is planning something like this called the Social Credit System. Details are sketchy at this stage but it is due to be up and running by 2020.”

  9. […] couple of weeks ago I posted about the unequivocal proof I had involving Facebook’s bias in temporary blocking. This a a brief update to show that I took it a step further towards demonstrating Facebook’s […]

  10. Richard Nikoley on April 15, 2018 at 15:52

Leave a Comment

Follow by Email8k