It’s everyday. The stupidest, most indoctrinated, hold themselves up as pinnacles of virtue. “Smart” phones and social media accounts have given every moron-nobody-at all on the planet A VOICE!!! That’s “democracy” for you. A dive to the least common denominator bottom.
And he who is not sufficiently courageous to defend his soul — don’t let him be proud of his ‘progressive’ views, and don’t let him boast that he is an academician or a people’s artist, a distinguished figure or a general. Let him say to himself: I am a part of the herd and a coward. It’s all the same to me as long as I’m fed and kept warm.
— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
You would have to do some reading and thinking to understand them even as they do not understand themselves. Essentially, it’s their desire for the unearned—which is nothing new—but it has a modern twist that’s at the root of communist and socialist ideological antagonism since the beginning that goes beyond the basics: “what’s in it for me?” What’s in it for them is described by what’s called Biolenninism, and at base, it’s more than just the food and shelter. It’s an awarding of unearned social status.
One of the most interesting theories to come out of the Dissident Right is the theory of Biological Leninism, or Bioleninism, which describes the rise, nay, the inevitability of a coalition of the weird, inadequate, foreign and not-quite-fit-for-civilized-society as a unified voting bloc supporting those in power in a liberal democracy.
Developed by Spandrell (alias, Bloody Shovel) it takes the basic Leninist model of building a Party to rule the state out of the dregs of society, and shifts this to the realm of biology, wrong-think biology in particular, building the party out of people who are permanent losers within the social order. Naturally, this refers to the non-white, non-heterosexual, non-viable forms of life we’re forced to prostrate ourselves to as the living saints of the religion of diversity. This is for the very simple reason that those with zero status in a sane society stake their entire lives on accumulating social capital through the Party and will revert back to that position of zero status if the party ever loses power, thus ensuring their undying loyalty towards the party and undying enmity towards those who aren’t lacking in status – whether we’re talking about the ne’er do wells of old Russia or the degenerate and swarthy masses of the modern West. In other words, Bioleninism is a system through which the governing Globohomo powers ensure that those most problematic of peons – white, Christian, heterosexual men (and the women married to them) will always be outvoted (and therefore expropriated, disenfranchised and ultimately eliminated) by the aforementioned non-viable life forms.
Many—even my smartest readers—and it’s minimum 110 IQ to even be a member—don’t understand why I subject myself to this sort of stuff. I’ll give you a clue. It’s easy to mock public figures and everyone does. But on the other hand, what really makes a difference is changing minds and to do it on a small scale: that’s done one walnut brain at a time, and you make them lose sleep. But the bigger thing is that others see and follow, as expected, and then feel stupid for following at all.
Do you notice anything? Before I ask you that again, let’s get to the screen clips. The first set is with Telfer Johnson and while I briefly thought about bringing my Facebook Archive of it live to here—a real permanent archive for 18 years already—I went meh, and let it alone. But as you’ll see later, Telfer couldn’t leave it how it was left here:
I’d actually hoped it had given him a bit of pause. No need for him to acknowledge anything, just do better next time.
I really do try to ward people off as best I can and of course, if I mention I might blog about it and it might show up in search for years to come, I’m mocked further, with hubris always. And yet I routinely get asked by people who find a way to contact me to PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE take their name and/or photo off post(s) from way back because people keep Googling them and then asking them, “what’s this?”
My advice is always the same, which actually goes counter—or does it?—to the very purpose of this post: tell them you don’t care, and to fuck off.
So yea, the real lesson here for my 4 male-like interlocutors is this:
I had asked if you noticed anything, above. Let’s give another clue.
Now another clue, the first comment to my comment on the post about objectifying Thai women, 2nd set of screen clips, above.
Robyn Rice to me: and you shouldn’t make any apologies. It sounds like you have both found an incredible love story. Thank you for sharing such a positive, thoughtful post!
Here’s what’s interesting about that. I had scanned down a number of comments and replies and shit storms and whatnot, and I had seen Robyn in a number of them and let’s just say she would be the very last person I’d have expected to reply to my comment like that. It hit her, touched her heart, whatever, in some way none of us are privy to and it’s a reminder than people can be quite the complex creatures and it’s sure one fuck of a good thing, whew!
On the other hand you will find, if you pay attention, that it’s the male-like who are first to jump up, hoping for female attention by means other than by being a man.