Get Your Social Security The Minute You Can

You'll learn it's not even comparable and might make you a few hundred Gs you might not get otherwise. Calculate hard.

I'm going to run you through the numbers using myself as an example since I qualify for "early" payments of a small fraction of what I've paid in since the age of 9 (53 years of paying by the age 62). Had I invested that money over that period in compounding securities I'd have millions.

But it is what it is. I'm not going to deal with the moral arguments.

  1. Yes it's abject socialism
  2. Yes it's coercion
  3. Yes it's a Ponzi scheme—legalized by the government for the government
  4. Yes it's regressive taxation (I'll explain why as an aside)

The other day I got an email from the Social Security Administration giving me a link to my record and an opportunity to check up on it, to make sure it's all correct and so forth. I hadn't seen anything in a while that I recall, so I checked in. I had not really realized I'm only a year away from "retirement," or, as they put it, "early retirement," "early benefits," early EARLY EARLY!!!

They don't do a hard sell to get you to wait until "full retirement" or "full benefits," but if you go around and about Googling, it's always couched in such terms. It's like a subtile nudge to shame you into waiting longer. ...Sort of a suggested delayed gratification thing.

  • Social Security as a regressive tax highly beneficial to the well off and rich
  • My own social security record
  • The easy case for taking benefits at 62 vs. 67 with simple math
  • Bonus Disaster Image; Tangential

Social Security as a regressive tax highly beneficial to the well off and rich

There's a few elements to this.

The first and biggest one is that which most employees never know about until they go off to leave their jobs (W-2 income) and start their own businesses dream (1099 income or many other tax forms depending on how the business is structured). Yea, they saw the social security deductions in their paychecks all those years, but didn't realize that it was only half of their tax. The other half was paid by their employer. It's split into social security and medicare but in total is about 15%—half and half employee and employer.

They go off, start a business, and make income—likely less than when employed, at least for a while—and when they file their first tax return, realize they're now on the hook for the entire 15%. Their tax just doubled. Way to incentivize entrepreneurial spirit and achievement leading to the real creation of jobs for others.

It get's worse for small to medium sized businesses where you're hauling in less than about $143,000 per year. That's the cap. In other words, you pay 15% up to $143K and then zero after that. So, no matter how much you make, your total load is capped at $21,000 for SS and medicare. You make $143,000, you pay $21K. Make $1 Billion, you pay $21K.

Regressive as fuck, eh?

It get's worse. This is the main trick of the wealthy to get tax liability down to a pittance compared to others in percentage terms. You go passive income. But, to live off passive income to the tune of, say, $100,000 per year, you need $1,000,000 in the bank or investments making 10% average and solid. If you're doing 3%, you need $3 Mil. If you're in passbook savings, you need $10 Mil. (Caveat: I'm no tax accountant or lawyer and so don't know if some forms of passive income are more equal than others...see below.)

Side story:

Once upon a time I was discussing with a smart fried—a Harvard grad and author of published books—the ins & outs of taxation and he hauled out Warren Buffet who back in those days was spouting how TAXES NEED TO BE RAISED!!! because he was paying so little.

In addition to telling him that the IRS probably wouldn't refuse a check from him for a few billion, I asked him if he had a clue as to why. Of course, he did not. It's because all of Buffet's income is passive, i.e., from investments and not from working for the man or even working directly, hands on.

If your income is derived passively from investments, two things:

  1. There's no social security or medicare tax
  2. Your income tax is about...wait for it...15% (what a coincidence)

I did this in my own company. At the time, I was taking substantial straight W-2 income and the taxes are insane once you get up to the $200K and above level. I started crunching numbers and it was clear.

  1. Reorganize from a C Corp to an S Corp
  2. Hire a "Manager" (so-called CEO or President)
  3. Run the business at arms length through that employee, making your income passive
  4. Take all my income as K-1 (an IRS form), reducing my tax to zero social security / medicare, to 15% straight income tax

Saved me a ton, plus I had shit-tons of time on my hands with plenty of capital. Sure wish I had played that end of it better....

My own social security record

I still have 3 years (2020, 2021, and 2022) to boost this. No, I have not filed for even 2020 yet...working on it. But, here's how it stands even if there's no additional "contributions."

This content is for Monthly Subscription, Annual Subscription, and Lifetime Subscription members only and is a preview. Login or Join for access at the level you choose. You can also subscribe to the Non-Pestering Newsletter with substantial free content on everything in your email every Wednesday and Sunday.
Login Join NowNon-Pestering Newsletter

Richard Nikoley

I'm Richard Nikoley. Free The Animal began in 2003 and as of 2022, contains over 5,000 posts. I blog what I wish...from health, diet, and food to travel and lifestyle; to politics, social antagonism, expat-living location and time independent—while you sleep—income. I celebrate the audacity and hubris to live by your own exclusive authority and take your own chances. Read More
Follow by Email8k